Camerons scales back Integreon facilities management deal By Matt Byrne 28 March 2013 11:26 17 December 2015 13:56 Sign in or register to continue reading. It's FREE Sign in Email Password Keep me logged in Forgot your password? Not registered? It's FREE! Register now Register with The Lawyer Means of Production 28 March 2013 at 13:03 Are law firms reducing ties to Integreon because it is planning on becoming an ABS and building its own legal capability in the UK? Reply Link Anonymous 28 March 2013 at 14:24 Are these changes linked to leadership change at Integreon and the fact that a number of senior leaders from Integreon have left recently. Reply Link Anonymous 28 March 2013 at 14:24 I heard it was Integreon who want to get out of this as they are losing so much money on it Reply Link oops 28 March 2013 at 14:33 The shambles of Duncan Weston’s career as managing partner at CMS is complete. This was the main pillar (or should I say ‘plank’, it seems so much more appropriate all round) of his strategy. This outcome was always on the cards. My friends and I who used to work in the support functions and took the first announcement ofoutsourcing as an opportunity to leave (well in advance of redundancy notifications) have moved on to bigger and better-paid jobs elsewhere. Thanks CMS! Reply Link Middle Of The Road 28 March 2013 at 14:38 Where’s your Integregone, where’s your Integregone? Where’s your Integregone, where’s your Integregone? Where’s your Integregone, where’s your Integregone? Far far away. Reply Link Happy Daze 28 March 2013 at 14:59 As someone who used to work at CMS and saw the support teams being destroyed by this process, this news has made my Easter. Out for a few drinks tonight. Cheers! Reply Link Poetry 28 March 2013 at 15:21 I remember Duncan paying the support teams (pre Integreon) a visit asking people to take a 4% paycut to protect jobs. Within a year or so many who did were gone anyway. Reversing the Integreon deal does not make it right. The CMS managmenet team should resign but they’d probably mess up trying to implement that too. Toothless, useless, hopeless, worthless. Reply Link TUPE or not TUPE 28 March 2013 at 15:49 If I were one of those now affected, I’d be looking for a change of employment outside of the CMS-Integreon net. Believe me, this incessant tickering with staff has been going on for 6 years and I doubt it will stop even now. Reply Link Anonymous 28 March 2013 at 16:44 Outsourcing in EC1 – der!? Flawed from the off executed disastrously. Word was that Integreon were losing 250k/month….. Reply Link Tim 2 April 2013 at 01:46 What there partners fail to realise is what motivates support staff, who often do mind numbing and repetitive tasks, is not only a wage but pride and a sense of belonging. Most of the support staff are proud to say they work in the City, to have interaction with lawyers, to be able to say they work for Freshfields or Camerons. Many like to do a good job because they see the lawyers working hard and want to support them in their efforts. Relationships of mutual support and respect are often formed and grow. When you outsource this work to staff who have sense of belonging to the firm you lose all of this. Reply Link Anonymous 2 April 2013 at 12:03 So those advocating the outsourcing have buggered off because of the flaws in this model. Lets hope other law firms do some proper due dilligence and learn from this experience and are not tempted by fancy pitches and false promises of cost savings. Reply Link Safety 4 April 2013 at 14:47 Well said Tim! Reply Link Anonymous 12 April 2013 at 12:20 Oh how I laughed when I heard about this!!!! With all their “knowledge” and me just being part of “Services”, I saw this coming in 2010. Made my day!!!! Reply Link Name Email Cancel reply Threaded commenting powered by interconnect/it code.