The litigation funders bankrolling oil giant Excalibur’s claim have initiated a claim against Clifford Chance for its role in the case, which ended in Excalibur’s dramatic defeat last year.
The firm had already been criticised heavily by Mr Justice Christopher Clarke for producing “voluminous and interminable” correspondence which was “in some circumstances highly aggressive and in others unacceptable”. Clarke J also meted out stinging criticism of Excalibur, which he accused of pursuing “spurious claims” “relentlessly to the bitter end”.
Now the funders are waging battle with Clifford Chance. It follows a hearing last month, when the High Court ruled that the nine third-party funders backing the original case were liable for £23m in indemnity costs.
Withers partner Christopher Coffin represented Psari and Andonis Lemos in that case and is now understood to be representing the Lemos family in the fresh claim, which is still in the early stages.
Just when Clifford Chance thought the Excalibur nightmare was over, a fresh battle commences.
Also on TheLawyer.com:
- UAE firm Galadari adds DIFC office
- Taylor Wessing reports 5.5 per cent rise in global half-year revenue
- Kingsley Napley hires Mishcon partner Harris to launch media and reputation group
|Litigation – Winckworth Sherwood: Age discrimination — getting the right comparator on early retirement|
|Employment – Gateley: Let’s have a ‘friendly discussion’: business relationships and arbitration|
|Intellectual property – Walker Morris: The parody exception to copyright infringement|
|Information technology – Nabarro: Managing the risk of IT failure|
|Company – IBB Solicitors: Plans to change the culture of late payment by big businesses|