Webster Dixon wins legal expense insurance case By Margaret Taylor 3 November 2011 14:02 17 December 2015 14:15 Sign in or register to continue reading. It's FREE Sign in Email Password Keep me logged in Forgot your password? Not registered? It's FREE! Register now Register with The Lawyer Anonymous 4 November 2011 at 10:13 One of the recommendations of the Jackson report is that the bte industry should grow to replace legal aid/cfa funding. If Rupert ever had the misfortune of attempting to navigate the rather unique practices of bte legal expenses insurers, I am sure his report would be significantly redrafted. Well done webster dixon on this small victory Reply Link Anonymous 3 July 2012 at 14:47 What a farcical decision. The insurers are paying so why can’t they choose the solicitor, as long as they are competent? How can they set the premiums if they don’t know what the legal spend is! Reply Link Name Email Cancel reply Threaded commenting powered by interconnect/it code.