Latimer Lee partner defends Man U fan in dispute over Man City expansion By Margaret Taylor 19 March 2012 00:02 17 December 2015 13:30 Sign in or register to continue reading. It's FREE Sign in Email Password Keep me logged in Forgot your password? Not registered? It's FREE! Register now Register with The Lawyer Anonymous 19 March 2012 at 08:14 The tactics being employed by this guy are selfish beyond belief. Depriving East Manchester of jobs because of football club loyalties is frankly pathetic. He’ll lose and be forced to sell at market rate so he’ll end up with less money than was origunally offered no doubt. Another daft decision by a man who gas already gone bust previously I have read. Reply Link Marshall Whittaker 19 March 2012 at 10:29 I cannot see that any true sportsman would be so blatantly pig headed as to object to City expanding their grounds. This reeks of profit opportunism and I fear that , as so often is the case, the only people who will benefit from this silly little show of bad faith are the lawyers . No disrespect to the lawyers involved , that is their job and they must act on their instructions but really this is stretching 15 minutes of fame too far. Reply Link peterpop 19 March 2012 at 12:07 What else would you expect from a bitter red nose.Do you think this guy would sell his £250 plots to any of the public,without finding out if they support City or not.Wouldn,t be surprised if he didn’t have some backing from the swamp Reply Link Jeremy Poynton 19 March 2012 at 16:41 Pale grey typeface on a white background means anyone with poor eyesight cannot read this blog. Author – there’s a reason books are printed in black and white… Oh and by the way, how much is O’Brien’s firm in the red? £350K or more, I read. Sounds like that is what he trying to address to me… Reply Link roger haigh 19 March 2012 at 17:55 i’m sure the ratepayers of manchester will be delighted that the legal profession will be earning a small fortune from this dispute. When the council win their case o’brien should be made to pay all costs. Reply Link Stu 19 March 2012 at 18:06 This guy is just bright enough to realise that he will lose the land anyway. So why not use football rivalry to mug off a load of gullible United fans and pocket £1.3m from many United fans in the process rather than £1m he would get from City. A bit of joined up thinking and enterpreneurship I would say! Reply Link Anonymous 19 March 2012 at 19:43 Typical rag fan and they call us bitter.Jobs for the area anew home for his buisness and a big improvement to the area,whats up with him Reply Link Anonymous 20 March 2012 at 10:04 I understood that they weren’t new jobs for the area which were being created – rather they were just moving existing jobs and staff from their carrington training ground to the new site. Presumably the new site is attractive as anyone who lives in the area knows City have been given urban regeneration funding to move sites. In effect Trafford jobs are moving to Manchester. I don’t know anything about the facts of the dispute (nor do i care) but i suppose the owner who may have been there for a long time may feel aggreived that he should be forced to move just because the football club (which is relatively new to the area) decides it needs more space and wants to take advantage of government/EU money. Reply Link Name Email Cancel reply Threaded commenting powered by interconnect/it code.