Tesco landed in hot water earlier this year after overstating its half-year profits by £250m and could now face claims from a raft of shareholders represented by Stewarts Law.
The supermarket giant has already called in Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer to investigate the overstatement, determine whether any rules were broken by the chain and advise management on how to respond.
Freshfields’ workload could now be set to expand following the news that Stewarts Law is seeking institutional investors looking for compensation in the wake of the scandal.
It isn’t the first time a Stewarts Law claimant group has taken on a major corporation. The firm is currently representing a group of over 300 institutional claimants suing the Royal Bank of Scotland over a 2008 rights issue they allege misrepresented the health of the bank.
The firm has returned to a litigation funder to bankroll part of the case, this time furnishing its multi-million pound budget with support from Bentham Europe.
Also on TheLawyer.com:
- Teacher Stern triumphs against Mishcon’s Saudi prince in Supreme Court
- Bird & Bird and Dechert saddle up for Assos v ASOS trademark battle
- 20 Essex Street takes Holman Fenwick commercial director for new role
|Real estate – Dentons: Apportioning the magic and sparkle — Supreme Court to consider M&S break clause rent apportionment case|
|Intellectual property – Walker Morris: Website-blocking order granted to prevent trademark infringement|
|Construction – Nabarro: Liberty v Cuddy (3): is the court acting as a bondsman?|
|Banking & finance – Walker Morris: AIB v Redlers: the extent of a lender’s loss caused by solicitors’ breach of trust|
|Litigation – Shoosmiths: Settling your dispute — a risky business?|