When is use of a competitor’s name as a metatag ‘advertising’? - .PDF file.
By Timothy Pinto
The parties in this case are competitors, making and distributing laser technology sorting machines. The claimant was Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology NV (also known as BEST NV). Its machines were named Helius, Genius and LS9000, for example. The defendant, Visys NV, registered the domain name bestlasersorter.com and linked the resulting URL to its website, www.visys.be. Visys used the following metatags for search-engine-optimisation purposes: Helius sorter, LS9000, Genius sorter, Best+Helius, Best+Genius and Best nv.
BEST sued Visys in Belgium for trademark infringement and breach of the misleading and comparative advertising and domain-name registration laws. The Court of Justice was asked whether the registration or use in a domain name and/or the use in a metatag fell within the definition of ‘advertising’ in the directives on misleading and comparative advertising.
The definition of ‘advertising’ is ‘a representation in any form made in connection with a trade, business, craft or profession in order to promote the supply of goods or services…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Taylor Wessing briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.