Australia’s new transfer pricing laws overlap the thin cap rules: new challenges for taxpayers - .PDF file.
By Jock McCormack
The overlap of Australia’s new transfer pricing laws with the thin capitalisation rules is causing challenges and likely duplication of analysis for taxpayers — particularly for the arm’s-length amount-of-debt test.
Australia legislated comprehensive new transfer pricing laws in 2012 and 2013. These laws were passed in two instalments: Subdivision 815-A, dealing with assessing powers under the equivalent of our double tax agreements (DTAs) and retrospective to 1 July 2004, and Subdivisions 815-B to D, which were broader (applying to both DTA and non-DTA circumstances) and of prospective effect from 1 July 2013. In addition, Subdivision 284–E of Schedule 1 of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 contains specific transfer pricing documentation requirements.
The new transfer pricing laws were largely introduced as a response to the commissioner of taxation’s loss in the full federal court decision in Commissioner of Taxation v SNF (Australia) Pty Ltd (2011). In that decision, the court rejected several of the commissioner’s fundamental technical arguments — not least, it rejected the legitimacy of the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations as approved by the council of the OECD…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing.