The company has accused DLA and four of its partners as well as a raft of US firms of conspiring “to file and prosecute a fraudulent lawsuit […] based on fabricated evidence, for the purpose of extorting a lucrative and unwarranted settlement.”
The claim goes back to 2010, when DLA stepped in to act for Ceglia, who argued he was due a 50 per cent stake in Facebook based on 2003 contract documents.
The contract and emails used in court as evidence were later dismissed as frauds and Ceglia was indicted by a federal grand jury. Now Facebook is out to seek revenge on his lawyers.
Meanwhile DLA has hit back, calling Facebook’s action a “meritless” and “entirely baseless lawsuit that has been filed as a tactic to intimidate lawyers from benign litigation against Facebook”.
DLA and Zuckerberg aren’t likely to be Facebook friends any time soon then.
Also on TheLawyer.com:
- Linklaters’ disputes head Michael Bennett says he will not appoint a London head at risk of having “too many people with too many badges”
- Specsavers triumphs in ASda trademark battle after switching from Eversheds to HGF Law
- Eon legal head Line takes on CMA probe role alongside Pinsents
|Employment – DLA Piper: Social media policies in the workplace|
|Personal Tax – Winckworth Sherwood: Duties of private trustees|
|Insurance – Ince & Co: Court of appeal authoritatively confirms fraudulent devices rule|
|Crime – Addleshaw Goddard: Who owns a bribe or secret commission?|
|Banking – Shoosmiths: What are the consequences of cashing cheques in full and final settlement?|