DWF takes on Government in panel-related High Court battle

Being kicked off a panel always stings but for DWF the loss of the Government’s Insolvency Service (IS) panel work was just too hard to take. As we report today, the firm is in a High Court showdown with the agency over its decision to choose Shepherd and Wedderburn.

Most firms would like a peek at the panel selection process and that’s just what DWF’s lawyers demanded. Their conclusion? That the IS process was unlawful and constituted a breach of duty.

Sour grapes or a “partial and relative, ad-hoc comparison” using “arbitrarily selected” criteria? The High Court will decide.

The current spat follows the Government’s decision to put in place a new central litigation panel last year. The outcome of this Government vs. law firm case will also be watched closely by the Ministry of Defence. The department is on the hunt to refresh its roster for the first time in five years.

Panel processes – a fight to the death? Maybe not. But a fight in the courts, certainly.

Note: The questionnaires for this year’s UK200 Annual Report have been sent out. If you haven’t received it yet, please contact matt.byrne@thelawyer.com

Also on TheLawyer.com:

Featured Briefings
Litigation: Schillings: Divorce proceedings become more reportable following High Court judgment
Employment: No5 Chambers: Regulatory enforcement of the minimum wage
Intellectual property: Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co: Mira secures significant damages award
Company: Shoosmiths: Persons with significant control: a proposal to reveal who controls your company
Banking: DLA Piper: Mixed feelings: China censures bitcoin while Hong Kong embraces it