Fieldfisher Wragges and Lawrence Graham prepare for £170m merger vote By Katy Dowell 18 November 2013 12:31 17 December 2015 13:49 Sign in or register to continue reading. It's FREE Sign in Email Password Keep me logged in Forgot your password? Not registered? It's FREE! Register now Register with The Lawyer Anonymous 18 November 2013 at 12:46 It’ll help LG if they then have a good intellectual property dept. Reply Link Anonymous 18 November 2013 at 13:13 Why on earth would Wragges want to saddle themselves with this? They have done so well over the last 10 years that they can surely do better than picking up a medioka firm on a downward trajectory. Reply Link Twerk 18 November 2013 at 13:59 Can Wragges offload their London property and move into Lawrence Graham’s then? That would appear to be the most sensible option. How much do Wragges have in London? Reply Link Law Hamster 18 November 2013 at 14:23 Law Hamster says: This is a very good deal. It solves fundamental and long term problems for both firms. The partners at either firm would be daft to reject it. Reply Link Anonymous 18 November 2013 at 15:07 Wragges has done well in the past 10 years but does seem to have lost its way of late. LG is in a downward spiral and needs rescuing – it’s probably past the worst now that it has sub-let space in its offices. This could be a very canny move by Wragges at the right point in the LG life cycle – pick up a credible London practice on the cheap and build from there. Very interesting…. Reply Link Anonymous 18 November 2013 at 15:37 Agree with 3.07, prestigious but under performing London practice picked up on the cheap will give Wragges the London exposure they need to propel them up the top 100 and give themselves more high profile work. One hopes some marketing wizzkid can come up with a better name than LG Wragges/Wragges LG/WLG/LGW. Also what mid-tier firm thinks it is a good idea to rent property at the height of the market in GBP70 per square foot office space. Reply Link Anonymous 18 November 2013 at 16:37 Re Law Hamster, the same was said about the LG/FFW discussions but the Partners still rejected it without even going to a vote. And now LG have sublet the space that would have created the financial premium in that deal Reply Link Law Hamster 18 November 2013 at 17:03 @Anonymous 18 Nov 4:37 pm very true, you can lead a partnership to a strategic opportunity, but you can’t make them think Reply Link Anonymous 18 November 2013 at 20:09 The potential tie up does make commercial sense. There is synergy between the firms practice areas and LG are coming out of the financial property gloom commitments whilst W&Co are on a work and financial resurgence. The joined up firm could leverage themselves into the UK Top 20ish within a few years. The question is, of course, if the partnerships can look beyond their own navels and overcome their fear. To do so would require open minds from the majority of the Partners of both firms and some foreward thinking and willingness to ‘Make it so’…A little like the Crabtree & Poole era at Wragges in the 90’s. Without such a willingness to grasp the opportunities and make a go of it, then both may well languish. I would trust that it becomes a ‘Yes’ and wish them well. Reply Link Anonymous 19 November 2013 at 08:37 Makes a lot of sense. Both firms gain economies of scale. Both gain greater resources for international expansion. Wragges gains a scale presence in London it would struggle to build organically. LG gains a presence outside London becoming more balanced and also able to utilise Wragges lower cost base for some work. The fact that LG is not magic/silver circle does not mean this is not a good merger for both firms and is in fact irrelevant. The only thing to judge is whether this transaction creates a stronger firm. And it does. Reply Link Dragonfly 19 November 2013 at 08:53 Law Hamster – you have uttered an eternal truism and a gem at that. Congrats. Reply Link Anonymous 19 November 2013 at 10:10 Perhaps some parallels with Addleshaw Booth and Theodore Goddard? Reply Link Anonymous 19 November 2013 at 11:29 I understand that LG and W&C discussed a potential merger a number of years ago and those talks collapsed. It is perhaps a sign of desperation that the failed talks have recommenced as I query what has changed in the legal landscape? A merged unit would create a strong Birmingham outfit with an underperforming London branch – the international offices of both firms do not generate significant fees. I therefore wonder what real benefit there is for W&C merging with LG? Reply Link Anonymous 19 November 2013 at 17:06 For those with long memories a possible rerun of the unsuccessful merger talks between Wragges and DJ Freeman ? Reply Link Name Email Cancel reply Threaded commenting powered by interconnect/it code.