Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
- Litigation / Dispute Resolution (242)
- Company/Commercial (155)
- Employment (117)
- Real Estate (89)
- Corporate (83)
- Banking / Finance (76)
- Regulatory and compliance (74)
- Financial services (56)
- Intellectual Property (49)
- Tax (37)
- Pensions (36)
- Construction (35)
- Information Technology (35)
- Funds (34)
- Planning (27)
- Energy (26)
- Insolvency & restructuring (25)
- Environment (19)
- Public Sector/Local Authority (19)
- Healthcare (17)
- Private Equity (15)
- Insurance/reinsurance (14)
- PPP/PFI/Commercial projects (14)
- Commodities (13)
- Competition/EU (13)
- Crime (13)
- Family (12)
- Media/Entertainment/Sport (11)
- Human Rights (10)
- Personal tax / Trusts (10)
- Pharma/Biotech (10)
- Telecoms (9)
- Transport (Including aviation and shipping) (9)
- Business Tax (7)
- Professional Indemnity/Negligence (7)
- Private Client (6)
- Charities (2)
- Immigration (2)
- Personal Injury (2)
- Privacy and reputation (2)
- Travel and Tourism (2)
- Clinical/Medical Negligence (1)
- In-House (1)
- Licensing/Gaming/Betting (1)
- Other (1)
- Sovereign Wealth (1)
432 articles matched your search
Sort By: Newest first | Oldest first
This was the finding in GSM Export (UK) Ltd (in Administration) and another v Revenue & Customs Commissioners, in which GSM Export appealed against a refusal of repayment of input tax.
In an unexpected about turn, Unite has announced that it will not pursue an appeal against the decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal in Bear Scotland v Fulton.
The courts can and will order professional funders of hopeless litigation to pay costs on an indemnity basis
In Excalibur Ventures LLC v Texas Keystone, Excalibur’s claim for $1.6bn in relation to an alleged interest in a profitable oil field in Kurdistan was dismissed, with indemnity costs ordered against it.
The remit of disclosure orders under section 236 and the distinction between information and documentation
The Chancery Division has granted liquidators’ application for disclosure of documents under s236 Insolvency Act 1986 in order to help them investigate possible claims against the respondents.
In James & Anr v Chircop, the court entered judgment against the defendants (James and another) due to failure to attend the trial.
The Chancery division allowed liquidators’ application for disclosure of documents under s.236 Insolvency Act 1986 in order to investigate possible claims against the respondents.
The knowledge referred to under s14(A) of the Limitation Act 1980 (s14(A)) is knowledge of the material facts about the damage and time starts to run from that knowledge.
The High Court has considered the duty owed by the defendants to the claimant when selling an interest rate hedging product, and whether the defendants had breached that duty.
The Privy Council in Bermuda has handed down judgment in the connected cases of Singularis and Saad.
In two recent cases, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has considered the issues of assignment for managers.
Where evidence indicates that a charging order does not fully secure a judgment debt, the creditor can issue a statutory demand for the unsecured part.
This was the finding of the High Court in Avonwick Holdings Ltd v Webinvest Ltd and Shlosberg.
Failure to comply with a disclosure order or to attend trial without notice or reason are serious failures leading to the strike out of the defence and counterclaim.
The Court of Appeal has handed down a further significant judgment in the patent dispute between British Telecommunications and ASSIA.
Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co has advised real-estate investment trust Empiric Student Property on a £65.6m secondary fundraising.
Anthony Thompson, private capital partner at Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co, has been named as one of eprivateclient’s Top 50 Most Influential 2015.
The Wealthbriefing GCC Region Awards celebrated outstanding practitioners from the wealth management industry.
The law firm’s real-estate practice was credited for its role in delivering innovative legal advice to secure a run of important deals.
Ruth Ormston was named ‘Champion of Justice’ at the LLST Awards, while the law firm also won an award recognising its support of the LLST walks.
Bot has proposed that the Court of Justice should dismiss both of Spain’s applications for the annulment of EU regulations relating to the Unitary Patent package.