Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
- Litigation / Dispute Resolution (165)
- Company/Commercial (94)
- Employment (76)
- Real Estate (53)
- Regulatory and compliance (49)
- Financial services (37)
- Banking / Finance (36)
- Corporate (33)
- Pensions (25)
- Construction (22)
- Information Technology (19)
- Intellectual Property (19)
- Planning (17)
- Energy (16)
- Tax (16)
- Environment (14)
- Insolvency & restructuring (14)
- Commodities (12)
- Funds (12)
- Healthcare (12)
- Crime (10)
- Public Sector/Local Authority (10)
- Insurance/reinsurance (9)
- Family (7)
- Human Rights (7)
- Competition/EU (6)
- Media/Entertainment/Sport (6)
- Transport (Including aviation and shipping) (6)
- Personal tax / Trusts (5)
- Private Equity (5)
- Professional Indemnity/Negligence (5)
- Business Tax (2)
- Personal Injury (2)
- Pharma/Biotech (2)
- PPP/PFI/Commercial projects (2)
- Telecoms (2)
- Clinical/Medical Negligence (1)
- In-House (1)
- Privacy and reputation (1)
- Travel and Tourism (1)
Sort By: Newest first | Oldest first
The Royal Court of Guernsey was asked to consider the circumstances in which trustees could be personally liable to repay loans obtained in their capacity as a trustee.
The English courts have again considered the weight that should be given to a nuptial agreement when exercising its discretion under section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973.
New patent law proposals laid in Parliament could result in clinical trials being brought back to the UK.
Wealth management and asset management sectors: what you should be aware of in FCA’s Business Plan 2
Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co’s experts outline some of the key issues for which the asset management, wealth management/private banking sectors should prepare.
The HS2 Bill will permit the construction of the first phase of the national high-speed rail network that will connect London Euston to Birmingham Curzon Street.
In Rose, the Administrative Court considered whether a CCG had acted unlawfully in failing to follow guidance issued by NICE.
In February 2013, the European Commission released a draft Network and Information Security Directive.
Allowing independent providers into the NHS Pension Scheme — tackling recruitment issues and facilitating the movement of staff
From 1 April 2014, an independent provider who meets the relevant eligibility criteria will be able to apply to become an employing authority in the NHS Pension Scheme.
The implications for pensions are likely to be significant, with consequences for DC schemes and, indirectly, for DB schemes.
HHJ Pelling QC has offered some useful guidance on assessing an account of profits for passing off in his recent judgment.
Accountability — April 2014: when can you bring a court claim that has already been the subject of a decision by the FOS?
According to a Court of Appeal decision, only where the claim arises out of a completely different set of facts or where the complainant has rejected the FOS decision.
The decision in Rawlinson & Hunter Trustees SA and Ors v Akers & Anr has highlighted the difficulties in establishing litigation privilege in relation to internal reports.
The case of Clarke v Barclays Bank plc and another has highlighted the importance of notifying the court promptly if an expert retires or withdraws from a case.
In the case of Mehjoo v Harben Barker, the Court of Appeal overturned the earlier decision of the High Court.
On 1 April, the Groceries Code Adjudicator issued two guidance documents relating to GSCOP: dispute escalation and arbitration.
Part of the cross-government Health, Work and Wellbeing initiative, the ‘Health and Work Service’ will provide occupational health advice and support for employers and employees.
In Rusal, the Administrative Court was asked to find that a decision by the London Metal Exchange to consult on a single preferred option was unfair.
The secondary legislation that sets out the detail on how workplace pension reform works has been subject to two phases of amendment.
This was one of the issues that the High Court had to deal with in Aodhcon LLP v Bridgeco Ltd in which the claimant entered into a bridging loan.
This was the finding of the Court of Appeal in Da Rocha-Afodu and another v Mortgage Express Ltd.