Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
- Litigation / Dispute Resolution (264)
- Company/Commercial (133)
- Employment (119)
- Regulatory and compliance (73)
- Real Estate (70)
- Corporate (56)
- Banking / Finance (54)
- Financial services (50)
- Intellectual Property (45)
- Pensions (35)
- Tax (32)
- Construction (31)
- Information Technology (27)
- Insolvency & restructuring (27)
- Funds (22)
- Energy (20)
- Planning (20)
- Crime (16)
- Environment (16)
- Family (15)
- Healthcare (15)
- Commodities (13)
- Public Sector/Local Authority (13)
- Competition/EU (12)
- Insurance/reinsurance (12)
- Pharma/Biotech (12)
- Human Rights (10)
- Transport (Including aviation and shipping) (9)
- Media/Entertainment/Sport (8)
- Personal tax / Trusts (8)
- Private Equity (8)
- Professional Indemnity/Negligence (8)
- Business Tax (6)
- Privacy and reputation (4)
- PPP/PFI/Commercial projects (3)
- In-House (2)
- Personal Injury (2)
- Private Client (2)
- Telecoms (2)
- Clinical/Medical Negligence (1)
- Immigration (1)
- Public Sector Watch (1)
- Travel and Tourism (1)
Sort By: Newest first | Oldest first
How can a company prove that its designer came up with a print independently?
The DIFC has released a month-long public consultation on its draft rules relating to succession and inheritance matters for non-Muslims with assets in Dubai.
Exotic trademarks have always been difficult to get on the register.
This was the finding in GSM Export (UK) Ltd (in Administration) and another v Revenue & Customs Commissioners, in which GSM Export appealed against a refusal of repayment of input tax.
In an unexpected about turn, Unite has announced that it will not pursue an appeal against the decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal in Bear Scotland v Fulton.
The courts can and will order professional funders of hopeless litigation to pay costs on an indemnity basis
In Excalibur Ventures LLC v Texas Keystone, Excalibur’s claim for $1.6bn in relation to an alleged interest in a profitable oil field in Kurdistan was dismissed, with indemnity costs ordered against it.
The remit of disclosure orders under section 236 and the distinction between information and documentation
The Chancery Division has granted liquidators’ application for disclosure of documents under s236 Insolvency Act 1986 in order to help them investigate possible claims against the respondents.
In James & Anr v Chircop, the court entered judgment against the defendants (James and another) due to failure to attend the trial.
The Chancery division allowed liquidators’ application for disclosure of documents under s.236 Insolvency Act 1986 in order to investigate possible claims against the respondents.
The knowledge referred to under s14(A) of the Limitation Act 1980 (s14(A)) is knowledge of the material facts about the damage and time starts to run from that knowledge.
The High Court has considered the duty owed by the defendants to the claimant when selling an interest rate hedging product, and whether the defendants had breached that duty.
In two recent cases, the Employment Appeal Tribunal has considered the issues of assignment for managers.
The Privy Council in Bermuda has handed down judgment in the connected cases of Singularis and Saad.
Where evidence indicates that a charging order does not fully secure a judgment debt, the creditor can issue a statutory demand for the unsecured part.
This was the finding of the High Court in Avonwick Holdings Ltd v Webinvest Ltd and Shlosberg.
Failure to comply with a disclosure order or to attend trial without notice or reason are serious failures leading to the strike out of the defence and counterclaim.
Bot has proposed that the Court of Justice should dismiss both of Spain’s applications for the annulment of EU regulations relating to the Unitary Patent package.
What issues do workers of different ages face when trying to enter the workforce?
The Supreme Court has delivered its judgment in Plevin v Paragon Personal Finance Ltd & Another, which has potentially far-reaching implications for lenders.
The claimant, IPC Media, is the publisher of the Ideal Home magazine. The defendant, Media 10, runs the Ideal Home Show.