Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
- Litigation / Dispute Resolution (165)
- Company/Commercial (94)
- Employment (76)
- Real Estate (53)
- Regulatory and compliance (49)
- Financial services (37)
- Banking / Finance (36)
- Corporate (33)
- Pensions (25)
- Construction (22)
- Information Technology (19)
- Intellectual Property (19)
- Planning (17)
- Energy (16)
- Tax (16)
- Environment (14)
- Insolvency & restructuring (14)
- Commodities (12)
- Funds (12)
- Healthcare (12)
- Crime (10)
- Public Sector/Local Authority (10)
- Insurance/reinsurance (9)
- Family (7)
- Human Rights (7)
- Competition/EU (6)
- Media/Entertainment/Sport (6)
- Transport (Including aviation and shipping) (6)
- Personal tax / Trusts (5)
- Private Equity (5)
- Professional Indemnity/Negligence (5)
- Business Tax (2)
- Personal Injury (2)
- Pharma/Biotech (2)
- PPP/PFI/Commercial projects (2)
- Telecoms (2)
- Clinical/Medical Negligence (1)
- In-House (1)
- Privacy and reputation (1)
- Travel and Tourism (1)
Sort By: Newest first | Oldest first
Wragge & Co brings you the latest on the cases and issues affecting the lending industry.
One of the main Jackson reforms to affect civil litigation was the abolition of the recoverability of ATE insurance premiums and success fees in CFAs from the losing (paying) party.
Wragge & Co provides a summary of changes that will apply to workplace pensions form 1 November 2013 and 1 April 2014.
Guidance published on the implementation of the new directors' remuneration regime for quoted companies
The GC100 and Investor Group has published guidance on how the new directors’ remuneration regime for quoted companies is to be implemented.
On 30 October 2013, the third ordinance amending the fruit juice and soft drink regulation and other foodstuff-related provisions was published in the Federal Law Gazette.
The Pensions Regulator issued a statement on 25 October 2013 warning against ‘double counting’ in defined-benefit pension schemes.
In the third update of 2013, Wragge & Co’s private equity specialists comment on key issues and recent developments affecting the sector.
The Court of Appeal has given judgment in the ‘stay’ application in the long-running patent dispute between IPCom and HTC.
The Pensions Regulator’s new Code of Practice no. 13, ‘Governance and administration of occupational defined contribution trust-based pension schemes’, has come into force.
Wragge & Co’s construction experts review cases involving challenges to adjudication enforcement on jurisdictional and natural justice grounds.
Claim for cease and desist against sending unrequested ‘tell a friend’ recommendation emails via a recommendation function
The Federal Supreme Court has found that a claim for cease and desist can be asserted against the company that provides a recommendation function at its webpage.
This briefing from Wragge & Co sets out an overview of the draft regulations and a table summarising the key amendments.
The Equality Act 2010 prohibits discrimination against an individual based on their age. However, there are a number of statutory exemptions in the UK that apply to this overriding principle.
With the John McCririck age discrimination case hitting the headlines, Wragge & Co experts look at this case alongside other age discrimination developments this year.
Litigators have been warned: failure to comply, for which there is no good reason, will not usually attract relief from sanction.
Wragge & Co has released the November issue of its Finance Litigation Briefing, which reports on cases and issues including Forsta Ap-Fonden v Bank of New York Mellon.
November saw the Pensions Regulator Code on the governance and administration of occupational defined contribution (DC) trust-based pension schemes come into force.
ThinkHouse podcast — IP and patents, confidential information, online compliance and competition law download
This ThinkHouse podcast from Wragge & Co focuses on intellectual property and patents, confidential information, online compliance and competition law.
A refusal to engage in ADR could amount to unreasonable conduct and expose a party to cost penalties.
In Feltham v Bouskell, the defendant argued it would be unjust to award the additional sum.