Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
- Litigation / Dispute Resolution (291)
- Company/Commercial (188)
- Employment (139)
- Real Estate (103)
- Corporate (98)
- Regulatory and compliance (88)
- Banking / Finance (80)
- Intellectual Property (67)
- Financial services (63)
- Tax (47)
- Funds (45)
- Pensions (45)
- Construction (44)
- Information Technology (43)
- Energy (30)
- Insolvency & restructuring (29)
- Planning (28)
- Public Sector/Local Authority (26)
- Healthcare (22)
- Competition/EU (20)
- Environment (20)
- Pharma/Biotech (19)
- Family (18)
- Crime (17)
- Insurance/reinsurance (16)
- PPP/PFI/Commercial projects (16)
- Private Equity (16)
- Commodities (14)
- Human Rights (13)
- In-House (13)
- Transport (Including aviation and shipping) (13)
- Personal tax / Trusts (12)
- Media/Entertainment/Sport (11)
- Telecoms (10)
- Business Tax (9)
- Private Client (8)
- Professional Indemnity/Negligence (8)
- Privacy and reputation (6)
- Public Sector Watch (3)
- Travel and Tourism (3)
- Charities (2)
- Clinical/Medical Negligence (2)
- Immigration (2)
- Personal Injury (2)
- Licensing/Gaming/Betting (1)
- Other (1)
- Sovereign Wealth (1)
538 articles matched your search
Sort By: Newest first | Oldest first
The double tax treaty between France and Luxembourg contains a favourable tax regime for capital gains on shares of real-estate companies.
Employment update — December 2014: contract variations; holiday pay; shared parental leave; and more
Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co’s employment experts bring you the latest developments that may affect your business.
If recent surveys are an accurate reflection, there may be more interest in shared parental leave than originally anticipated.
How can a company prove that its designer came up with a print independently?
The DIFC has released a month-long public consultation on its draft rules relating to succession and inheritance matters for non-Muslims with assets in Dubai.
Exotic trademarks have always been difficult to get on the register.
This was the finding in GSM Export (UK) Ltd (in Administration) and another v Revenue & Customs Commissioners, in which GSM Export appealed against a refusal of repayment of input tax.
In an unexpected about turn, Unite has announced that it will not pursue an appeal against the decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal in Bear Scotland v Fulton.
The courts can and will order professional funders of hopeless litigation to pay costs on an indemnity basis
In Excalibur Ventures LLC v Texas Keystone, Excalibur’s claim for $1.6bn in relation to an alleged interest in a profitable oil field in Kurdistan was dismissed, with indemnity costs ordered against it.
The remit of disclosure orders under section 236 and the distinction between information and documentation
The Chancery Division has granted liquidators’ application for disclosure of documents under s236 Insolvency Act 1986 in order to help them investigate possible claims against the respondents.
In James & Anr v Chircop, the court entered judgment against the defendants (James and another) due to failure to attend the trial.
The Chancery division allowed liquidators’ application for disclosure of documents under s.236 Insolvency Act 1986 in order to investigate possible claims against the respondents.
The knowledge referred to under s14(A) of the Limitation Act 1980 (s14(A)) is knowledge of the material facts about the damage and time starts to run from that knowledge.
The High Court has considered the duty owed by the defendants to the claimant when selling an interest rate hedging product, and whether the defendants had breached that duty.
In two recent cases, the Employment Appeal Tribunal has considered the issues of assignment for managers.
The Privy Council in Bermuda has handed down judgment in the connected cases of Singularis and Saad.
Where evidence indicates that a charging order does not fully secure a judgment debt, the creditor can issue a statutory demand for the unsecured part.
This was the finding of the High Court in Avonwick Holdings Ltd v Webinvest Ltd and Shlosberg.
Failure to comply with a disclosure order or to attend trial without notice or reason are serious failures leading to the strike out of the defence and counterclaim.
The Court of Appeal has handed down a further significant judgment in the patent dispute between British Telecommunications and ASSIA.