Wragge & Co
- Litigation / Dispute Resolution (83)
- Company/Commercial (51)
- Employment (48)
- Real Estate (36)
- Banking / Finance (23)
- Regulatory and compliance (22)
- Corporate (18)
- Pensions (16)
- Construction (15)
- Intellectual Property (15)
- Information Technology (14)
- Financial services (12)
- Funds (12)
- Planning (10)
- Public Sector/Local Authority (10)
- Tax (10)
- Energy (8)
- Private Equity (8)
- Environment (7)
- Insolvency & restructuring (6)
- Competition/EU (5)
- Healthcare (5)
- Human Rights (5)
- Insurance/reinsurance (5)
- Media/Entertainment/Sport (4)
- Telecoms (4)
- Commodities (3)
- Family (3)
- Transport (Including aviation and shipping) (3)
- Crime (2)
- Personal Injury (2)
- Business Tax (1)
- Charities (1)
- Clinical/Medical Negligence (1)
- In-House (1)
- Licensing/Gaming/Betting (1)
- Other (1)
- Personal tax / Trusts (1)
- Pharma/Biotech (1)
- PPP/PFI/Commercial projects (1)
- Professional Indemnity/Negligence (1)
159 articles matched your search
Sort By: Newest first | Oldest first
In JL Homes Ltd v Mortgage Express, Diakiw and Heap (acting as LPA receivers), the court stepped in to avoid further costs and court time being wasted and granted a civil restraint order.
Finance companies are liable to the ultimate customer on the basis of joint and several liability with the supplier — and this includes in relation to fraudulent misrepresentations.
A Court of Appeal decisionhas ended the legal uncertainty as to whether claimants who had accepted the maximum amount the Ombudsman can award could then sue in court for the balance of their losses.
In Thakker and another v Northern Rock (Asset Management), it was found that a breach of the MCOB rules does not affect the underlying right to possession.
A dispute related to a shipbuilding contract where the bank guaranteed the payment obligations of its customer, the buyer, to the claimant seller under the contract.
The EAT has confirmed that the restriction of a surviving civil partner’s pension to the member’s post-4 December 2005 pensionable service is compatible with EU law.
Private rights, public wrongs: Trafford v Blackpool Borough Council — the public law control of contractual discretion
This case is a reminder that while local authorities have the power to do ‘anything that individuals generally may do’, this does not mean they are free to make decisions as individuals might.
The private equity team at Wragge & Co has advised Mobeus Equity Partners on a £6m investment in the management buyout of Entanet International.
There is an increasing focus on defined-contribution investment issues.
In Hillcrest Homes v Beresford and Curbishley, the TCC decided that claims that had been advanced in negligent misstatement and misrepresentation could not be adjudicated.
HMRC has issued a keenly awaited announcement in response to the CJEU’s ruling in PPG Holdings BV (C-26/12).
The growing number of age discrimination cases offers a stark reminder to employers to think twice before basing any headcount reduction policies on age.
John Baldwin QC has delivered a noteworthy judgment concerning the use of trademarks in keyword advertising and in the search results returned by website search tools.
Wragge & Co’s intellectual property (IT) team has won TMT Team of the Year at The Legal Business Awards.
What is the status of an adjudicator’s decision, in the period following the decision but before a judgment by a court or an award by an arbitrator? Just how ‘binding’ is it?
There may be circumstances when disclosure of a party’s insurance arrangements can be ordered by the court
A group of litigants has been granted an order for disclosure of a defendant’s insurance arrangements in respect of the defendant’s potential liability in the litigation.
The Court of Appeal has given clarification on the threshold that an applicant must meet in order to obtain pre-action disclosure.
The case of Richard Gabriel v Peter Little and others has highlighted the importance of engagement letters in clarifying the scope of a professional retainer.
On 10 December 2013, HMRC published the 2014 Draft Finance Bill. The new rules will come into effect from 6 April 2014.
When the Civil Procedure Rules were amended last year, the revised overriding objective made it clear that the rules were in place to enable the court to deal with cases justly and at proportionate cost.