- Litigation / Dispute Resolution (7)
- Real Estate (5)
- Employment (3)
- Planning (3)
- Construction (2)
- Insolvency & restructuring (2)
- Business Tax (1)
- Company/Commercial (1)
- Crime (1)
- Energy (1)
- Environment (1)
- Intellectual Property (1)
- Licensing/Gaming/Betting (1)
- Personal tax / Trusts (1)
- Regulatory and compliance (1)
- Tax (1)
Sort By: Newest first | Oldest first
In the context of personal insolvency, the most valuable asset within the estate is often the property in which the bankrupt resides and in which he has an interest.
A private trustee’s duties can be onerous and it is important that a trustee is aware of them before accepting the office of trustee.
The Patent Box is a new preferential tax regime that came into force on 1 April 2013.
On the making of a bankruptcy order, the bankrupt’s estate vests in the trustee in bankruptcy. However, it is not always clear exactly what falls within the bankrupt’s estate.
Changes to mandatory conditions — Licensing Act 2003 (Mandatory Licensing Conditions) (Amendments) Order 2014
Premises licence holders will be aware that all licences are subject to mandatory conditions. The wording of some of the conditions is to change.
Many developers frequently rely upon their right to terminate a contract if a project is severely delayed by the actions of another party.
Developers should be fully aware of these neighbourly issues and risks, otherwise they could be faced with delays, increased costs and potentially an injunction.
Housebuilders, large and small, are all too familiar with the well-established ‘weapons of choice’ aimed at delaying or thwarting development.
To avoid last-minute hurdles, there are a number of points to be aware of during the development and plot sales process.
Many new developments include communal boiler systems or energy centres, which are used to supply hot water and/or electricity to individual homes.
Mrs Whiteley (the claimant) commenced employment with HMRC on 23 October 1978 and was still employed when this case was heard.
The EAT has considered whether the tribunal at first instance should have taken into account a claimant’s post-termination conduct when determining his award of compensation.
The EAT has held that where an employer has found an employee to have committed gross misconduct, it is not automatically reasonable to dismiss that employee.