- Employment (32)
- Litigation / Dispute Resolution (31)
- Real Estate (14)
- Family (11)
- Company/Commercial (8)
- Public Sector/Local Authority (7)
- Banking / Finance (4)
- Environment (4)
- Funds (4)
- Information Technology (4)
- Insolvency & restructuring (4)
- Planning (4)
- Tax (4)
- Energy (3)
- Other (3)
- Personal tax / Trusts (3)
- Construction (2)
- Corporate (2)
- Crime (2)
- Licensing/Gaming/Betting (2)
- Media/Entertainment/Sport (2)
- Regulatory and compliance (2)
- Charities (1)
- Clinical/Medical Negligence (1)
- Healthcare (1)
- Human Rights (1)
- Insurance/reinsurance (1)
- Intellectual Property (1)
- Pensions (1)
- Transport (Including aviation and shipping) (1)
Sort By: Newest first | Oldest first
This decision represents a welcome return to the ‘pay for what you use’ principle and strikes a fairer balance between different creditor and expense groups.
Winckworth Sherwood has provided a summary of the Trusts (Capital and Income) Act 2013.
The Home Office has published a consultation on the shift from centrally to locally set licence fees.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has considered whether an employee was entitled to the national minimum wage for the hours she spent sleeping at work.
Gallop v Newport City Council demonstrates that an OH report cannot be relied on unquestioningly by the employer in deciding whether an employee is disabled.
CJD v Royal Bank of Scotland considered the dismissal of an employee accused of assaulting his partner (who was also his colleague) outside of work.
It will sometimes be the case that an individual will be neither an employee nor a worker and thereby without any protection against unfair dismissal or discrimination.
Heads Up — December 2013 download
Winckworth Sherwood has released its December issue of Heads Up, which discusses the issues that faced education throughout 2013.
The Court of Appeal has delivered some welcome Christmas cheer for landlords.
The EAT has upheld a decision that ECFRS was not reasonably expected to know (from a legal perspective) that one of its employees was disabled.