The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
White & Case intends to appeal against Friday’s (27 October) ruling from the Hong Kong High Court that it behaved illegally when hiring a rated restructuring team from Deacons.
The court ruled that White & Case encouraged two rated insolvency lawyers, Mark Fairbairn and Edward Cairns, to breach their partnership contracts and persuade clients to move across with them to White & Case.
A damages hearing is likely to take place early next year.
However, the judge dismissed Deacons claims that White & Case breached a non-solicitation clause relating to merger talks between the two firms in 1999.
A White & Case spokesperson said the firm, “is gratified that the judgment handed down Friday by Deputy High Court Judge Gill in the Deacons dispute vindicates our position in key areas, especially the rights of clients to select the law firms of their choice. Additionally, the Judge found no cause for injunctive relief and dismissed several allegations made against White & Case and our partners, including claims that a Non-Solicitation Agreement was breached and that the partners improperly referred business to our firm.”