The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Mr Justice Jackson will this morning (5 June) hand down his judgment in the bitter battle between Multiplex and Cleveland Bridge over the construction of the new Wembley Stadium.
Jackson J will deliver his decision orally over two days rather than handing down a draft in advance, ratcheting up the tension for advisers Clifford Chance and Walker Morris.
Four New Square head of chambers Roger Stewart QC was instructed by Clifford Chance partner Alex Panayides for Australian company Multiplex. He argued that North East steel company Cleveland Bridge was responsible for delays to the construction of Wembley's new signature arch and that they were worth damages to the tune of £38m.
Stewart kicked off the case by remarking: "It's perhaps a pity…that we're not able to sit in Wembley, where there's a 90,000-seat capacity and plenty of fresh air."
Walker Morris partner Martin Scott instructed Matrix Chambers' Hugh Tomlinson QC to argue Cleveland Bridge's counter-claim of £22m.
Tomlinson claimed that Multiplex project director Ashley Muldoon had formed an "Armageddon plan" designed to oust Cleveland Bridge from the project.
Scott said: "The case is very much grounded in the facts. It was always going to be a very hard action."
The case was heard over four weeks beginning on 25 April.