Webster Dixon wins legal expense insurance case

  • Print
  • Comments (2)

Readers' comments (2)

  • One of the recommendations of the Jackson report is that the bte industry should grow to replace legal aid/cfa funding. If Rupert ever had the misfortune of attempting to navigate the rather unique practices of bte legal expenses insurers, I am sure his report would be significantly redrafted. Well done webster dixon on this small victory

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What a farcical decision. The insurers are paying so why can't they choose the solicitor, as long as they are competent? How can they set the premiums if they don't know what the legal spend is!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (2)