Wall St crisis? Blame SarBox
The cause of the current financial crisis on Wall Street runs much deeper and is far more complex than is commonly believed. The disastrous effects of the sub-prime mortgage fiasco is merely the final straw which broke the camel's back.
Sarbanes-Oxley, the ill-conceived, knee-jerk reaction to the accounting scandals of a few years ago, has caused significant damaged to the US financial services industry and is the single largest contributing factor to the turmoil currently taking place on Wall Street.
Sarbox, at it is familiarly known, has made listing in the US far less attractive to both domestic and foreign issuers and has driven IPOs, and their investment banking fees, overseas.
Although various studies have been put forth to demonstrate that Sarbox has had little or no negative effect on the US economy, those studies fail to take into account various subtle and complex latent factors, such as the Acts impact on the US investment banking sector. Although opponents of big business have focused extensively on the sub-prime mortgage crisis, they seem to be missing the bigger picture.
Certainly bad loans are a large part of the meltdown currently takFing place on Wall Street, however they are not the main factor behind the collapse and sell-offs of Lehman, Merrill Lynch and other venerable banking institutions.
During the 1980s and 1990s, the vast majority of the world's 25 largest IPO?s were listed in the US. In 2006, however, of the top 25 global IPOs, only two were registered in the US and every one of the top ten were registered abroad.
For the first 11 months of 2007, approximately $255 billion was raised via 1,739 IPOs globally. But of those deals, only 178 IPOs were listed in the US, comprising a mere $39bn of the total raised.
At the larger investment banks, which usually act as bookrunners on these IPOs charge fees in the range of 7 per cent of proceeds, billions of dollars in underwriting fees have been lost since Sarbox came into effect in 2002, precipitating the investment banking failures we see today.
This is not the first time in Wall Street's history that the investment banking sector has made bad investment decisions, however it is the first time Wall Street has done so without the support of large profits to help offset these poor decisions. As the results speak for themselves, it can no longer be disputed that the U.S in passing, and failing to repeal Sarbanes Oxley, is
regulating itself out of the financial services industry.
Needless to say, a strong investment banking sector is vital not only to the national and international economies, but to America's role as a world leading nation.
John Maalouf is the chair of Maalouf Law, a New York-based law firm with offices in London, Hong Kong, Boston and Shanghai.
View results 10 per page | 20 per page
Readers' comments (18)
Steve Jones | 26-Sep-2008 11:30 pm
Extremely Insightful Look At Wall Street Crisis
Superb article, an extremely insightful look into the crisis plaguing Wall Street. Mr. Maalouf is exactly right, without the IPO revenue, which the investment banks were deprived of by Sarbox, Wall Street could not afford the losses from the risky investments in the subprime mortgage sector.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Ed Tenant | 29-Sep-2008 3:05 am
excellent article
Sarbox is the greatest single threat to the U.S. financial services industry, what we need is to repeal this poorly thought out piece of legislation which only hinders the finance sector from acting efficiently, excellent article.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Mr. Best | 27-Oct-2008 0:16 am
NFA does it again now for Forex
We haven't learned our lesson. This week the NFA and congress regulators fired anther dart into a much less known industry but as damaging will be the result. Brokers aka FDM's in foreign exchange "FX" until a year ago could participate as market makers with as little as 1mm. Now the industry has decided in the name of regulation and for the good of the people it should be 20mm. I have been in the industry now for 10 years and know many many brokers that will simply leave the country looking for a more capitalist society. If you don't think this matters you should know that the industry is about 60 billion a day in trade volume. All going off shore now!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Skeptic | 13-Nov-2008 9:47 pm
What?
Sarbox did about as much to "cause" this crash as weak breaks would in a car driven by a drunk.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 21-Nov-2008 6:54 pm
The regulators never learn
Exactly right, the regulators never learn. They keep over regulating the market and fail to see the negative ramificartions of their actions.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Alistair | 23-Nov-2008 2:02 pm
Really!!!
It is a sad fact that business does not like being monitored but really needs it. SOX benefitted those businesses who complied because it exposed areas where controls were deficient.
The IPO's that failed to materialise obviously did not want these deficiencies exposed. Also, it is not only the American banks that are suffering now. Where are the foreign bank profit cusions they got from the IPO's America missed out on?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 1-Dec-2008 2:29 pm
Sarbox is responsible for the decline in the IPO market
Sarbox is one of the greatest contributors for the decline in the US-IPO market. The section 404 of Sarbox is the most contentious aspect of the legislation requiring management and the external auditor to report on the adequacy of the company’s internal control over financial reporting (ICFR).
It is also the costliest aspect of the legislation for companies to implement. It involves the documenting and testing of the important financial controls both manual as well as automated, which in turn requires enormous resources of the company in terms of infrastructure and manpower allocation.
It requires an upgrade to the corporate IT infrastructure to comply with all the reporting requirements as required by Sarbox. Implementing SOX section 404 could potentially cost a mid-sized company approximately 5% of total sales revenue in the first year and approximately 2.5% of total sales revenue every year thereafter.
No wonder the accounting firms love SOX as it contributes to a fat portion of their total revenues for consulting on implementing and reporting requirements for Sarbox.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Jared A. Carrington | 25-Feb-2009 2:19 pm
Brilliant Article
Brilliant article, Mr. Maalouf has hit the nail exactly on the head. The U.S. has regulated itself out of the investment banking industry, Wall Street as we know it is gone and now the country is suffering. Mr. Obama perhaps you should consider nominating Mr. Maalouf as your new Secretary of Commerce, he seems to be one of the few people who understand the cause of the current crisis and therefore how to solve it.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment