- Litigation / Dispute Resolution (301)
- Company/Commercial (191)
- Employment (127)
- Regulatory and compliance (122)
- Real Estate (116)
- Intellectual Property (105)
- Public Sector/Local Authority (91)
- Banking / Finance (81)
- Corporate (80)
- Energy (78)
- Environment (64)
- Financial services (57)
- Planning (49)
- Competition/EU (42)
- Insolvency & restructuring (39)
- Pensions (37)
- Construction (28)
- Media/Entertainment/Sport (27)
- Tax (27)
- Information Technology (26)
- Crime (22)
- Funds (19)
- Healthcare (15)
- Insurance/reinsurance (14)
- Professional Indemnity/Negligence (13)
- Family (12)
- PPP/PFI/Commercial projects (12)
- Commodities (10)
- Human Rights (9)
- In-House (9)
- Personal tax / Trusts (9)
- Charities (8)
- Pharma/Biotech (8)
- Telecoms (8)
- Immigration (6)
- Other (6)
- Private Equity (5)
- Clinical/Medical Negligence (4)
- Transport (Including aviation and shipping) (4)
- Business Tax (3)
- Personal Injury (3)
- Agriculture (2)
- Privacy and reputation (2)
- Licensing/Gaming/Betting (1)
Sort By: Newest first | Oldest first
An updated statement from the CMA highlights issues that we can expect to form the focus of the its investigation.
Section 106 Agreements between developers and local planning authorities outlining obligations in relation to new developments are currently subject to statutory time limits at the negotiation stage.
Judicial review: recent reforms download
Certain judicial review reforms reforms – that attracted fierce debate in Parliament and within the legal profession – have now received the Royal Assent. They will be significant to many and a concern to some.
When Gordon Ramsay sought a declaration that he was not bound by the guarantee in a lease the issue was whether he had authorised a signature by his father-in-law. But the father-in-law was not called to give evidence.
The overriding objective of the Civil Procedure Rules is that cases must be dealt with “justly and at proportionate cost”. Now costs cases are coming through thick and fast, what key principles and tips can we derive?
A contracting party always wants to protect itself against the breach of its counterparty. But two recent cases show that parties can shoot themselves in the foot if they complete a clause that amounts to an unenforceable penalty.
We now have the advocate-general’s opinion in the ‘Woolworths’ case.
Jackson, Denton, Mitchell… anyone involved with civil litigation over the last two years will have heard these names repeatedly and will be aware of their importance to compliance with the new rules.
While a headline glance at the Supreme Court’s judgment in this long-running case might give developers some encouragement a closer look reveals that the issues in play are not quite so straightforward.
It is often said that there is a thin line between madness and genius. That was demonstrated neatly by the tenant in the recent case of Hough v Greathall.