- Litigation / Dispute Resolution (246)
- Company/Commercial (170)
- Employment (107)
- Real Estate (100)
- Regulatory and compliance (96)
- Intellectual Property (88)
- Public Sector/Local Authority (82)
- Banking / Finance (72)
- Energy (72)
- Corporate (70)
- Environment (56)
- Financial services (52)
- Planning (39)
- Pensions (37)
- Insolvency & restructuring (36)
- Competition/EU (35)
- Tax (24)
- Information Technology (23)
- Media/Entertainment/Sport (23)
- Funds (19)
- Construction (18)
- Crime (18)
- Healthcare (14)
- Insurance/reinsurance (13)
- PPP/PFI/Commercial projects (12)
- Professional Indemnity/Negligence (11)
- Commodities (9)
- Human Rights (9)
- Personal tax / Trusts (9)
- Charities (7)
- Family (7)
- Pharma/Biotech (7)
- Other (6)
- Telecoms (6)
- Private Equity (5)
- Clinical/Medical Negligence (4)
- Immigration (4)
- In-House (4)
- Personal Injury (3)
- Transport (Including aviation and shipping) (3)
- Agriculture (2)
- Business Tax (2)
Sort By: Newest first | Oldest first
The High Court has determined preliminary issues in a professional negligence claim against a firm of conveyancing solicitors brought by a mortgage lender.
For employers who hold a sponsorship licence, getting it wrong could result in the revocation of that licence and a curtailment on their ability to recruit overseas workers.
An application for a website-blocking order has been granted against an internet service provider in order to prevent trademark infringement.
From 1 October 2014, the UK Intellectual Property Office (UK IPO) has the power to revoke a patent of its own initiative.
The Community Trade Mark Regulation prohibits registration of trademarks that are devoid of distinctive character.
In Comic Enterprises v Twentieth Century Fox Film, the High Court ruled that the TV show infringed the figurative mark of a UK comedy club.
The media has reported that the Premier League is intending to clamp down on the unauthorised uploading of clips from televised football matches.
An application for registration of the name CANARY WHARF by Canary Wharf Group as a trademark has been refused.
The Court of Appeal has upheld a summary judgment on an application for a declaration of non-infringement of patent.
Design prior art must be visible download
The design in issue in Cezar v OHIM was for a skirting board duct.