- Company/Commercial (61)
- Real Estate (61)
- Intellectual Property (55)
- Employment (40)
- Banking / Finance (31)
- Insolvency & restructuring (23)
- Regulatory and compliance (20)
- Corporate (19)
- Financial services (19)
- Planning (16)
- Public Sector/Local Authority (16)
- Media/Entertainment/Sport (15)
- Construction (13)
- Information Technology (12)
- Pensions (12)
- Environment (11)
- Professional Indemnity/Negligence (10)
- Tax (9)
- Competition/EU (8)
- Crime (8)
- Human Rights (7)
- Energy (6)
- Funds (5)
- Healthcare (5)
- Clinical/Medical Negligence (4)
- Commodities (4)
- In-House (4)
- Insurance/reinsurance (4)
- PPP/PFI/Commercial projects (4)
- Personal Injury (3)
- Personal tax / Trusts (3)
- Pharma/Biotech (2)
- Telecoms (2)
- Agriculture (1)
- Business Tax (1)
- Charities (1)
- Family (1)
- Private Equity (1)
- Transport (Including aviation and shipping) (1)
Sort By: Newest first | Oldest first
The Company Names Tribunal was set up to adjudicate disputes arising under section 69(1) of the Companies Act 2006.
When a court assesses the amount of costs payable by one party in litigation proceedings to another, the costs may be assessed on either a standard basis or an indemnity basis.
Rights of a subrogated creditor download
Subrogation is a remedy allowing a party to step into the shoes of another party assuming the benefit of any rights that second party may have in relation to a liability.
Intellectual property disputes involving retailers and fashion are all too common; another one to have troubled the courts in recent months is Thomas Pink v Victoria’s Secret UK.
In Biscuits Poult SAS v OHIM, the applicant for invalidity challenged the registration on the basis that the design in question was not new and lacked individual character.
A Hamburg court has upheld findings that the distribution of certain models of jeans would infringe Levi Strauss’s trademark rights in the stitching pattern on the back pockets of its jeans.
In this case, the intervener applied for registration as a Community trademark of a figurative sign depicting a bicycle polo player in respect of Class 18, Class 25 and Class 28.
Registrability of shape marks download
In Hauck GmbH & Co KG v Stokke A/S, the Dutch court referred questions relating to the refusal to register shape marks under article 3(1)(e) of the Trade Marks Directive.
Walker Morris has strengthened its intellectual property group by appointing Rupert Bent as a partner and as the head of intellectual property.
Healthcare at Home Ltd v Common Services Agency (Scotland) concerns the interpretation of the ‘reasonably well-informed and normally diligent’ tenderer.
This article highlights some of the major changes to design rights that came into force on 1 October 2014.
This case law round-up focuses on two cases: Dawson (PO-596) and Chapman (PO-597).
The Pensions Regulator has finally reached a compromise in respect of the Financial Support Directions it issued in connection with the Lehman Brothers pension scheme.
The courts have decided a number of high-profile cases this summer in which retailers have been involved in intellectual property disputes.
Southend-On-Sea Borough Council v Armour is a tenancy repossession case in which the tenant invoked a successful article 8 defence.
Walker Morris has appointed Rupert Bent as a partner and head of intellectual property (IP). Bent was previously head of IP litigation at Pinsent Masons.
Promoting the use of alternative dispute resolution is one of the key ways in which the courts are trying to reduce the costs of litigation.
Mansfield District Council received grant money from the European Regional Development Fund for two development projects relating to town-centre improvements.
A recent High Court case concerned borrowers who had a buy-to-let portfolio with many of the properties mortgaged.
Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) provides that everyone has a right to respect for his home.