- Litigation / Dispute Resolution (147)
- Company/Commercial (110)
- Real Estate (69)
- Employment (67)
- Energy (54)
- Intellectual Property (54)
- Banking / Finance (52)
- Corporate (46)
- Public Sector/Local Authority (46)
- Regulatory and compliance (46)
- Environment (37)
- Financial services (31)
- Insolvency & restructuring (29)
- Planning (25)
- Competition/EU (17)
- Information Technology (17)
- Crime (15)
- Pensions (15)
- Construction (12)
- Funds (12)
- Media/Entertainment/Sport (12)
- Tax (12)
- Healthcare (9)
- Insurance/reinsurance (9)
- Professional Indemnity/Negligence (7)
- Charities (6)
- Other (6)
- Commodities (5)
- Personal tax / Trusts (5)
- Private Equity (5)
- Family (4)
- Pharma/Biotech (4)
- PPP/PFI/Commercial projects (4)
- Clinical/Medical Negligence (3)
- Human Rights (3)
- Telecoms (3)
- Agriculture (2)
- Personal Injury (2)
- Transport (Including aviation and shipping) (2)
- In-House (1)
Sort By: Newest first | Oldest first
In Fage UK v Chobani UK Ltd, the claimant, FAGE, was a Greek manufacturer of yoghurt and its UK distributor.
A representor has been held liable for its negligent misrepresentation to another party other than the party that was later induced to conclude the contract.
A misrepresentation is a statement that induces entry into a contract and that turns out to be false.
Marshalling is an equitable remedy for achieving fairness between two or more secured creditors of the same debtor.
The Court of Appeal has delivered its judgment in the eagerly anticipated Game administration.
An administrator, liquidator or receiver must make a ‘prescribed part’ of the company’s net property available for the satisfaction of unsecured debts.
If an individual borrower is made bankrupt or dies or if a corporate borrower goes into liquidation, any receiver appointed loses the agency relationship they would have previously had.
Case law round-up — Pensions Matter, March 2014... an overview of key pension cases and their practical implications download
In McCoy, it was held to be reasonable for the trustees of a SIPP to require the beneficiary of a lump-sum death benefit to complete a form of discharge prior to paying out the discretionary benefit.
Steve Webb has confirmed that the government is ‘actively exploring’ if it can amend the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) legislation in regard to employer insolvency.
The DWP has published a report that highlights the areas it believes have a strong case for an exemption from auto-enrolment duties for certain employees.
The government has now confirmed that ‘protected persons’ will not be prejudiced by the statutory override contained in the Pensions Bill.
Andrew Northage considers another case in which the FCA took enforcement action against inadequate anti-bribery procedures — even where no bribery had occurred.
It was announced on 29 January that the UK’s major supermarkets have agreed to report on how much food they waste each year.
Walker Morris regulatory team director Ray Watson provides an overview of the Competition Commission’s working paper on the profitability of payday lending companies.
This article will focus on the proposed reforms to judicial review and cost-capping orders, which will affect planning and environmental matters.
Repeated unmeritorious attempts by the borrower to avoid repossession by the receivers and lender led to the strike-out of the borrower’s claim.
The politics of sexual harassment download
The Lord Rennard ‘saga’ continues to play out in the news.
‘Firms must put the interests of customers first’ warns the FCA as it hands down its largest ever retail conduct fine download
Failings by insurance intermediary HomeServe have resulted in the company being fined £30.6m, the largest amount ever imposed by the Financial Conduct Authority for the retail sector.
The Court of Appeal has considered the levels of fines imposed for radioactive waste and health and safety offences committed by large companies.
Town and village greens — a delay in rectification of a wrong registration is not immaterial download
On 5 February 2014, the Supreme Court heard a joint appeal of two cases with different facts, but with the same issue to be decided.