Under the sea

  • Print
  • Comments (23)

Readers' comments (23)

  • AS A NUCLEAR VETERAN WITH CANCER AND BONE PROBLEMS FOR YEARS, JUST LIKE TO SAY THANKS TO MR ROSANBLATT, AND ALL HIS STAFF FOR THE CASE THEY TOOK TO THE MINISTRY OF DEFENCE,
    IT IS IRONIC THAT THE MINISTRY OF DEFENCE WILL NOW GO TO APPEAL,
    AFTER SPENDING OVER FOURTEEN MILLION IN THE LAST FEW YEARS, AND NOW TO SPEND MORE OF TAX PAYER'S MONEY,
    STRANGE THAT THEY DO AS THEY LIKE AND THE GOVERNMENTAND CABINET LET THEM WASTE THE PUBLIC MONEY ON FIGHTING THEIR OWN,
    IT'S SAD TO SEE WHAT THEY ARE DOING AS THERE WILL BE NOT MANY OF US LEFT,

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It is remarkable that this many vets read The Lawyer!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Is it so remarkable? I certainly do.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I am the daughter of an RAF serviceman who died in 1986 of bowel cancer and was in Christmas Island in 1958 for the tests. My mother is still alive and she has never really wanted to take on the British Government but feels differently now is she too late? If not what does she have to do?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Diane, your mother should contact Mr. Rosenblatt; my understanding is that cases of this type may be handled on a 'No Win, No Fee' basis.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The courts have condemned "no win, no fee" arrangements since the Statute of Westminster in 1275. Contingency fee arrangements were indeed generally considered to have been prohibited by Rule 8 of the Solicitors' Practice Rules 1990 (although some contradictory case law exists). What are not prohibited however are Conditional Fee Arrangements structured under Section 58 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 and the Conditional Fee Agreements Order 1998. Under a Contingency Fee Arrangement a solicitor is permitted to charge his or her clients a percentage of their "winnings" but under a Conditional Fee Arrangement this is not the case - they are permitted to charge their usual hourly rate plus an uplift.

    If I may posit; Mr Griffin is suggesting that cases of this nature may be handled under a properly structured Conditional Fee Arrangement. I cannot comment on Mr Rosenblatt's fee structure but you might find that some of the vets for whom he is acting enlighten you / assist further. I wish you well.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • the sad tail to all of this thier are number other people whom are effected may end up with nothing
    also un sung heros that whier invloved in the clean up and closure such establishments as well.
    Thay are all suffering as well.
    i have confired and testyed postive to prostrate cancer and cancer of the rectum
    Also Au Department defence has requested chest X Ray many of its serving ansd retired members in Australia.
    Also was placed in local news paper as well.
    As civlian i have to rely on the Australian publice health system for medical care i feel i have done my bit.
    No body seems to care,
    At lesat i have recived some support from Rosen Blatt Solictors.
    that about all
    Also have 2 other family members havwe cancer as welll
    My wife. worked in commerical laundry Sydney
    My Sister.Nurse
    My self as Truck Driver.
    The other issue is that various venues offering equipment fors sale that has a record known to be used in such locations whir these tests took place or such materials whir stored.
    this saga will not end for a long time and many years to come
    regards.
    ian

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sir I wish to thank rosenblatt solicitors for there hard work fighting this case for us without themwe would have wasted all our time.I would also like to say that if it had not been for derick redfern who put so much work and his own money collecting information to help thiscase,not like some who just wanted to line there own pockets. thank you mick dilworth

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I wish to thanx you all at rosenblatt solicitors for a outstanding result.
    My dad (Albert Stanley Burton) was on chrismas island in 1957 to 1958.
    He has suffered all his life with bone problems and bones crumbling. I too have a broken spine and all are famley are still suffering from the H BOMB.
    Saddley my dad passed away two years ago due to the H BOMB,He also asked me to keep on fighting for him and all his freinds.
    If there is anyone that new my dad too please get in touch with me as it a big peice of my dads life that is missing out of all are lifes.
    You can get in touch with me at. chris_burton1@hotmail.co.uk
    Thank you all once again.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sir, thanking you at Rosenblatt for your positive progress in representing the Nuclear Veterans and to achieve victory for and on behalf of the Vets. Unfortunately we are all now aware that the MoD has posted an appeal and we will most likely have to wait at least 2 years for some sort of reply. It has also now been noted that through the media that the Civil Servants at the MoD are to have a bonus of approx GBP42mill paid to them which makes one feel as if we did not exist. I am sure that the team at Rosenblatt are aware of this and also feel exasperated. Thanks once again for your professional efforts,

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (23)