The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
AN IRISH solicitor has won libel damages of u10,000 against a member of the profession in Britain.
Justin Sadleir, of Gort, County Galway, took the action in Galway Circuit Court over a letter written by Joseph Bateman, of Bovingdon, Hertfordshire.
The court heard that Sadleir had represented a company called Manorcraft in an action in Limerick County Court. Bateman was a director of Manorcraft and acted as solicitor for its principal shareholder.
In a letter to a fellow Manorcraft director in January 1993, he wrote that Sadleir was not interested in the company case and "would delay until the next millennium". He suggested that he be replaced.
Bateman's firm later apologised for the letter, but insisted it was not defamatory. However, a former president of the Incorporated Law Society, Michael Houlihan, testified that the letter was "grossly defamatory".
The judge, Mr Justice John Buchanan, agreed. The letter was protected by qualified privilege, he said, but the defence could not succeed because it was malicious.
Michael Fitzgerald, who received the letter, was not a client of Bateman, said the judge, and therefore the letter could not be classed as a professional communication.
"The law protects communications between solicitor and client and this valuable protection should not be extended beyond that relationship," said the judge.