The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Roger Pearson looks at two women's dispute over the right to cremate
The date has been set for a case in the High Court in which two women are fighting over the dead body of the man they loved.
David Brinson died of pancreatic cancer in May at the age of 42. At the time he was still married to his wife Sally, 40, of Orpington, Kent. However, he had not lived with Mrs Brinson and their two children since 1983.
That was the year he moved in with his mistress, Lorraine, who later changed her name to Brinson by deed poll and who lived with him until the time of his death.
Now the two women are involved in a legal battle over the right to cremate his body. Mr Justice Ognall has paved the way for the High Court to decide who should have the
right to do so.
Lorraine who lived with Mr Brinson and their two children at Wilmington, Kent, is seeking a court order that a coroner should issue her a certificate for cremation of the body.
However, the coroner has refused to issue a certificate in order to protect himself against a possible damages claim on the basis that he released the body to the wrong person.
Sally Brinson is also applying for a cremation certificate and she is expected to be fully represented when the case comes up for full hearing on 17 July.
Granting leave for the court challenge to go ahead, Mr Justice Ognall said he was satisfied that there was an arguable case for judicial review of the coroner's decision.
It was, he said, "a curious and quite interesting case".