Kian Ganz
Clifford Chances paralegals" />Outsourcing UK jobs always gets tempers going, especially in the English & Welsh legal profession. Therefore, the news that Clifford Chance was beginning to take its paralegals offshore to India and that Eversheds was embarking on outsourcing legal corporate due diligence work to an Indian company, was not welcomed by all. (See story, 11 August).
Clifford Chance already has seven Indian qualified paralegals employed in its service centre in Gurgaon, just outside Delhi. By the end of the year the number of paralegals will be 20, as well as ultimately almost 10 per cent of total business services staff, resulting in a saving of around 8m annually.
Gurgaons paralegal capacity of 20 will be a sizable chunk of Clifford Chances total London capacity of around 110 paralegals. And when considering that the paralegals in India will be expected to do work such as filing form 395 company charge submissions, due diligence reviews, shell company conversions and certain other work, which is normally the exclusive preserve of paralegals or London trainees, it leaves one to wonder, what exactly the London paralegals and trainees of the future will be doing.
Clifford Chance global managing partner David Childs said that trainee numbers in London would not be affected, seeing as they were the firms principal recruitment source.
However, he added that paralegal numbers in London may stay flat or drop slightly, as leavers are not replaced. Paralegals are usually on short term contracts and many tend to leave the magic circle after a one-year stint before they move on to training contracts at other firms or other careers, having perhaps become disillusioned with form 395 company charge submissions.
But while paralegal and low-end trainee work may be dull, it is an investment in young English legal talent for the long term - after all, how can you be expected to become a partner and to outsource and check the low-level, boring work, if you have never done it yourself?
Then again, there could be the hope that if all the low-level work leaves the UK, hungry trainees of the future will be able to get their fangs into juicier, higher-level work, such as drafting, negotiating, doing business development and leading teams - of Indian paralegals and lawyers?
Readers' comments (1)
Anonymous | 15-Aug-2008 4:29 pm
GOOD MOVE....BAD PERSUASION...
It is good that English law firms are seeing the light now, in getting the work to low cost destinations. Soon they will also realise that it is not worthwhile to do more than 50% of the work that English lawyers spent time on doing [including the unnecessary 'thank you', 'sorry', 'please' and loads of mannerisms for which they charge the clients]. It is time that English law firms, particularly the close city white club, wake up to the fact that their days are numbered. Soon, just like everything else such as cricket, football, business and other arts, legal profession will also be dominated by the developing countries like India and China.
And why are the lawyers who have posted their comments on 11th August story complaining. Have they not seen the Law Scoeity website which is inviting Indian firms to open offices and get businesses here? Are they not aware how vigiourously Law Scoiety is lobbying for Indian legal sector to open up for English law firms to get the bite of Indian legal services sector? How vigourously Law Scoiety advertised the QLTT route for loads of Indian lawyers to spent money on doing the transfer only to find out that the English legal job market is actually closed to people from outside the Europe? These people who I am sure support the other activities of Law Society cannot complain if English law firms are sending jobs to India.
But even this move will not lead to openning up of the Indian legal market as CC expects it to once they have transfered the jobs. Indian legal sector shouldn't allow the English law firms in India at par with other law firms. Even though this back door entry is acceptable as this creates jobs in India, front door entry of English law firms establishing their firms to practice law at par with Indian practitioners is not acceptable at all. Bad persuasion by CC though it is a good thing for India.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment