The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Being told that your behaviour has appalled even Rupert Murdoch must be one of the most singularly unnerving experiences imaginable - second only to being told you hold sexist views by the Daily Mail.
Nonetheless that is exactly situation one lawyer who worked for The Times is now facing (see story).
The incident that provoked Murdoch’s ire was the NightJack furore - where a piece in The Times revealed the identity of an anonymous police blogger - and the subsequent allegations that the Times’ lawyer misled the High Court at an injunction hearing about the story (for background, check out David Allen Green’s take on it in our own blogs section).
Murdoch made the comments in his written submission to the Leveson Inquiry, adding that he believed News International had referred the lawyer in question to the Solicitors Regulation Authority. The company has also apparently reviewed and issued guidance to all in-house lawyers following the NightJack story.
The lawyer that the NewsCorp boss is understood to be referring to is the paper’s former legal chief Alastair Brett, who left the publication in 2010.
This isn’t the first time that News International has put blame on its lawyers. Harbottle & Lewis was forced to defend itself after Murdoch cast aspersions on its role in investigating phone-hacking at the News of the World (16 August 2011).