The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
I refer to the 17 July article on page three about the Bar Council's "Barmark" mergers policy. I am writing to clarify our policy:
1. If chambers are proposing to merge, this should be made clear in their business plan and to BSI on the validation visit. Provisions should be made as to how the chambers will accommodate the extra numbers in terms of practice management and what changes they envisage will be necessary.
2. If chambers merge soon after the validation visit and neither BSI nor the Bar Council is convinced that a large increase in size has been suitably prepared for, they may need to have a reassessment.
3. If chambers merge a long time after the validation visit and a few months before the reassessment then while they should inform BSI and the Bar Council, it will probably be taken up in the reassessment visit rather than an assessment at the time of merger.
In all cases a common-sense approach will be applied depending on the timing of the merger and the resultant increase.