Other The Apprentice analysed… By The Lawyer 28 May 2008 14:53 14 December 2015 00:13 Sign in or register to continue reading. It's FREE Sign in Email Password Keep me logged in Forgot your password? Not registered? It's FREE! Register now Register with The Lawyer Mark Rowley 28 May 2008 at 19:46 Michael Sophocles I thought Michael was just great; am I the only one? Reply Link Uri 29 May 2008 at 09:42 LAWYERS GETTING IT SO WRONG – AGAIN!!! Shakespeare had a briiliant way to describe this kind of half-arsed expression of expertise. It goes something like “he speaks an infinite deal of nothing” and “you spend all day looking for it only to find it wasn’t worth the search.” Age Discrimination? Sex Discrimination? Mona Lisa? Leadership? How clever you are to flag up these directionless lines of analysis – how your clients must rejoice at the great value for money you present! Sir Alan’s point was that Helene was simply coasting in the background, venturing nothing, with a Mona Lisa demeanour designed to camouflage a total absence of any talent save the ability to prevail indefinitely – like the majority of equity lawyers in magic circle (and wannabe magic circle) firms! The “taint” was not her age or experience but the ‘cozy carpet’ mentality of staying within the established comfort zone. Michael’s flaw and strength was identified as his youth – taken at the right age he could turn out to be brilliant; released into the “wild” of legal or business “magic circle” medicocrity he will never grow and will simply take on the mantle of the Mona Lisa with its “keep your head down” safety plan. Michael had to go because he had too far to go to be of immediate use (you mean like the experts here?). Lucinda is a great manager but she is also an insufferable whinger & buck passer (which probably explains her appeal to certain accomplished experts in this), wasting valuable time on over-engineered appraisals (like we have read here?) of what needs to be done instead of just doing it (like Lee & Alex). More lawyers like Lee & Alex (the getting things done type instead of peddling bullsh*t on how to do things type) are what the profession needs, not CV genii with no real knowledge other than how to spin a case that never wins, never gets them into trouble but costs you a lot. Reply Link Anonymous 29 May 2008 at 09:56 Re; Michael Sophocles Yes. Reply Link Anonymous 29 May 2008 at 10:21 Michael who? Seriously, “Michael could turn out to be brilliant”??? Yeah, in a job where he has to work alone and is prevented from interaction with the world… Reply Link Anon. 29 May 2008 at 10:44 Uri ge’a life Sod the panelists or the magic circle – I want a lawyer like Uri. Nothing says commitment and focus like a 1000-word rant about telly with triple exclamation marks. Reply Link Anonymous 29 May 2008 at 10:50 Uri’s rant Uri’s babble is way off the mark – as Hannah Ford says, Sugar’s reference to the “taint of experience” screamed of age discrimination. Helene’s only similarity with the Mona Lisa was being ‘head and shoulders’ better than Michael. Reply Link Jamie 29 May 2008 at 14:30 Calm down, Calm down Uri: its a light hearted forum- pipe down, get back in your box and come out again when you’ve found your sense of humour! Reply Link Hulk Hogan & Hartson 29 May 2008 at 17:52 Suggestion I think the two dark-haired, fringe-sporting panelists should have a wrestling match against the two blonde-haired side-parting ones, with the bloke panelist as referee. I don’t know why, I just do. Reply Link Roy 29 May 2008 at 18:27 He say ‘Yes’ Date: 28-May-2008 @ 19:46PM From: Mark Rowley: ‘I thought Michael was just great; am I the only one?’ Yes! Reply Link Uri 29 May 2008 at 21:21 JUST HUM THE MEN IN BLACK THEME!!! Here come the Men in Drag…Employment Law Leg-enders….Here come the Men in Drag….Always moaning about yer gender… Hey! How’s that for comedy!!! Awooo! Awooo! Reply Link Vik 30 May 2008 at 12:31 Little Mike He should have gone, he did not live up to his gob. I kinda agree with Uri in his over analysed approach regarding most of the candidates mentioned. Is it true that Magic circle+ firms employ people who just put there heads down and work? I do know a few people who have training contracts with some of the big firms but when we studied together they were pretty deadwood. I graduated in 2007 and just came back from travelling a few months ago, and man is it tough to get into the legal sector. Anyway that was a bit off topic, but my money is one Alex of Claire. He is pretty sneaky and I reckon she has got the balls to ram it home. Lee lacks tact and Helene will probably go next week. Reply Link Sophia 4 June 2008 at 14:03 Take the Mickey Hurrah, Sophocles has gone – did anyone read the News of the World article in which he said he regretted having to bed “a dawn french lookalike with tache” to get ahead (no pun intended) – question is which candidate was he referring to??? Reply Link Name Email Cancel reply Threaded commenting powered by interconnect/it code.