- Intellectual Property (159)
- Company/Commercial (155)
- Litigation / Dispute Resolution (141)
- Information Technology (121)
- Employment (82)
- Insolvency & restructuring (78)
- Pensions (76)
- Banking / Finance (69)
- Regulatory and compliance (67)
- Pharma/Biotech (61)
- Corporate (57)
- Media/Entertainment/Sport (56)
- Real Estate (41)
- Financial services (37)
- Tax (35)
- Funds (25)
- Healthcare (22)
- Telecoms (22)
- Competition/EU (17)
- Business Tax (13)
- Energy (13)
- Licensing/Gaming/Betting (13)
- Private Equity (13)
- Environment (9)
- Insurance/reinsurance (8)
- Transport (Including aviation and shipping) (8)
- Commodities (7)
- Crime (7)
- Other (5)
- Personal tax / Trusts (5)
- Construction (4)
- Human Rights (4)
- Immigration (4)
- Public Sector/Local Authority (3)
- Charities (2)
- Planning (2)
- PPP/PFI/Commercial projects (2)
- Private Client (2)
- Family (1)
- Public Sector Watch (1)
- Travel and Tourism (1)
Sort By: Newest first | Oldest first
On 2 July 2014, the data protection provisions of the Personal Data Protection Act 2012 will come into force.
Law at Work — February 2014: reasonableness and extent of restrictive covenants did not apply to actions as a minority shareholder
In this case, the High Court had to consider whether non-solicitation and non-dealing restrictions for a period of six months after termination of employment were enforceable.
The UK court has given judgement in an action brought by Jack Wills against House of Fraser.
In the UAE, there are two separate jurisdictions that need to be considered. This update will focus on some recent developments in both jurisdictions.
It has been more than six months since the introduction of the new fee regime into the Employment Tribunal system, which took place on 29 July 2013.
Soft-toy manufacturer Margarete Steiff’s Community trademark applications for its ‘button in the ear’ have been found to be devoid of distinctive character and not registrable.
Investrónica filed an opposition to Olympus Imaging’s trademark application for the mark MICRO based on the prior Spanish registration for overlapping goods.
The GC confirmed the Board of Appeal’s decision and found that there was a likelihood of confusion between BIMBO DOUGHNUTS and DOGHNUTS.
MAC has published a report on the Tier 1 investor visa, which focuses on whether the investment thresholds of the current scheme provide sufficient economic benefits to the UK.
In the case of Specsavers International Healthcare Ltd and Others v Asda Stores Ltd, the CJEU ruled on the relevance of colour to a mark.
The Court of Appeal has allowed an appeal by a firm of financial advisers, In Focus Asset Management & Tax Solutions Ltd, against its former clients Mr and Mrs Clark.
The Employment Act is Singapore’s main labour law covering certain categories of employees.
The applicant filed a Community trademark application for a mark covering services including travel services and holiday camps.
In December 2013, Getty Images’ third appeal against OHIM’s decision not to register its PHOTOS.COM trademark was rejected.
In a rare win for the little man, Comic Enterprises Ltd has been successful in its claim Twentieth Century Fox’s use of the word ‘glee’ amounted to trademark infringement.
In San Evans Maritime v Aigaion Insurance, the court held that the defendant following underwriter was required to follow a settlement reached by lead underwriters under a follow clause.
Some of the UK’s largest landlords have overturned previous High Court cases that had allowed insolvent tenants to continue trading from their premises without paying rent.
The regulator has published its consultation on a draft revised Code of Practice No. 3 for DB scheme funding, a draft new DB regulatory strategy and a revised DB funding policy.
One of the key issues of a ‘yes’ vote in the Scottish independence referendum will be the impact it has on the provision of pensions across the UK.
Following the Wheels case and the PPG case we now await a further decision on the VAT charges on pension schemes, relating to the case of ATP Pension Service A/S v Skatteministeriet.