The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Brick Court Chambers’ joint head Jonathan Sumption QC has won the first battle of 2005 against old rival Lord Grabiner QC, head of chambers at One Essex Court.
Sumption was acting for auction house Christie’s in its appeal against a May 2004 decision of Mr Justice Jack in a case brought by art collector Taylor Thomson, represented by Grabiner.
Thomson sued Christie’s for misrepresentation and breach of duty of care after she bought a pair of urns described as "Louis XV" for £2m. Later a test – now discredited – dated the urns as being made in the 19th century. Although the judge decided that the vases did indeed date from the 1700s, he found Christie’s in breach of duty due to the way it had described the urns in a catalogue.
In the Court of Appeal decision handed down this morning (Thursday, 12 May) Lord Justice May, Lord Justice Jonathan Parker and Lady Justice Smith decided that Christie’s had not been in breach of duty, thus allowing the appeal. They dismissed a cross-appeal by Thomson.
Sumption was instructed by Rupert Boswall at Reynolds Porter Chamberlain. Herbert Smith’s senior partner and former head of litigation David Gold instructed Grabiner.
The next showdown between Grabiner and Sumption is expected to be the forthcoming hearing in a dispute over Chesterfield cigarettes, Philip Morris v Venfin Ltd.