Still buts in Jackson’s costs rejig By The Lawyer 5 March 2012 00:00 17 December 2015 13:35 Sign in or register to continue reading. It's FREE Sign in Email Password Keep me logged in Forgot your password? Not registered? It's FREE! Register now Register with The Lawyer Jon Lord 5 March 2012 at 15:31 I agree with Iain that the proposed new N260 is not great. It’s just a time consuming extension of the current version and is not coversant with costs budgeting templates or new draft bill format. It is going to need some more work towards a consistent format before costs are going to be tranparent as per Jackson’s vision Reply Link Name Email Cancel reply Threaded commenting powered by interconnect/it code.