Plant outlines priorities for change; corporate regulation group to be based in the City

Charles Plant
Transformation and modernisation are at the heart of the SRA’s agenda, SRA chair Charles Plant has declared.
In a wide-ranging speech at The Lawyer’s sixth annual Strategic Risk Management Conference yesterday, he presented his vision of an SRA that promoted “modern regulation that treats solicitors as adults, not tying them up in red tape and bureaucracy.”
“We are in a period of unprecedented change and there are challenges for all of us,” he said in his opening address, adding that “the whole profession needs to adapt to change.”
At the heart of the SRA’s transformation is the introduction of outcomes-focused regulation that promises to offer a more flexible approach for firms, and a new Solicitors Code of Conduct.
It will see the SRA take a lighter approach with firms that consistently complied with regulations, but clampdown heavily on those that did not.
“The key point is that firms and solicitors who respond positively will be able to enjoy a more constructive relationship with the SRA,” he said. “They will experience lighter supervision. Those firms who do not can expect to be dealt with severely.”
The SRA has come in for heavy criticism over the last year, particularly in the Law Society commissioned Smedley review and Hunt report (see story), and City practitioners who felt their interests were not being represented.
Plant acknowledged some of the criticisms were justified, and accepted that in the past it had been too focused on “prescriptive box ticking”.
But he argued the organisation had improved relations with major commercial firms, reaffirmed its independence from the Law Society and introduced a leaner and more efficient management structure.
He also announced the creation of an office near Cannon Street, which will house a new corporate regulation group to develop relationships with firms in the corporate sector and strengthen ties with the City. The SRA is in the process of finding someone to head up the group.
The SRA currently has around 600 staff split between its offices inRedditch and Leamington Spa. Another priority for the new-look board is to merge the offices at a new location in the West Midlands.
Other expected changes include the SRA board being made up of a majority of lay professionals within the next two to three years.
The new code of conduct will come into force on the same day that ABS is introduced, October 6, 2011.
The SRA is keen for set of rules to govern both traditional law firms and ABS to “create a level playing field for consumers,” which is why the new code will be introduced on the same day.
Plant admitted: “This is ambitious, we are under no illusions of the challenges this presents us.”
Readers' comments (3)
Brian | 17-Mar-2010 9:25 am
This is very welcome news as long as the words translate into reality; based on what I am seeing and hearing things are going in the right direction and I have been assured by the regulator that they will continue to do so.
I have been a risk and compliance practitioner in the profession for 18 years and in the past have been a strong critic of the regulator's approach in terms of focussing too much on prosecution rather than prevention, and not having a healthy relationship with those it regulates, so I don't make the above comments lightly.
It is time to put our differences aside and move on but it will be for both the regulator and regulated to show that they can both act, and should be be treated, like adults.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Graham Livings | 17-Mar-2010 4:23 pm
We shall indeed see; a client a victim a wholly different experience!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 17-Mar-2010 4:34 pm
I attended the public part of this meeting yesterday. I currently have two outstanding serious complaints against London lawyers and I'm getting nowhere. The SRA recently failed to effectively investigate one of my detailed complaints and so I complained about the SRA to the Legal Services Ombudsman. The LSO carried out a superb, forensic investigation and instructed the SRA to re-investigate. The SRA caseworker has informed me that he is "disappointed" with the LSO's directions and will not be reconsidering certain points that the LSO have told the SRA to reconsider. The reason appears to me to be that case-worker guidelines are hopelessly inadequate and amount to not much more than box ticking. Solicitors that wish to abuse the system seem to be able to do so with relative ease.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment