The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Clyde & Co has picked up 10 mandates in London relating to the investigation launched by US Attorney General Eliot Spitzer into broker Marsh & McLennan (M&M). These include an instruction from Munich Re to look at the terms and conditions of its broking relationships.
It is understood that Munich Re beauty-paraded four law firms for the role – Clyde & Co, DLA, SJ Berwin and US firm LeBoeuf Lamb Greene & MacRae – before plumping for Clydes.
Spitzer’s investigation into M&M, launched two months ago, has had major repercussions for the City insurance market. Spitzer accused M&M of price-fixing and giving kickbacks to insurers that gave it a good deal.
While the magic circle firm cleared M&M of the behaviour Spitzer is investigating in New York, the firm did say that a commission system, which rewards brokers for selling particular insurance policies, was widespread. Freshfields found that the system led M&M to put pressure on its brokers to favour certain insurers.
Many other UK insurers are now reviewing their standard broking terms and conditions in response to the Spitzer investigation.
While Clydes is renowned for its insurance practice, it is less well known for its competition capacity – certainly less so than DLA or SJ Berwin – so the Munich Re mandate is something of a coup for the firm.