The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
The Law Society has changed its rules to excuse solicitors from their duty to attend court in some civil and criminal cases where counsel has been instructed.
Under the old rule, solicitors could be disciplined for failing to attend, even if they were not actually needed or where clients could not recover costs from their opponent.
This meant that either the client suffered unnecessary expense or the solicitor had to provide the service free of charge.
The Law Society council acted because the new Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) allow the court to award a fixed sum for attendance of fast track civil trial cases only if it considers it was "necessary" for a legal representative to attend the advocate.
A report from the Law Society's remuneration working party points out that although the CPR do not directly conflict with solicitors' professional obligations, it sometimes presents a dilemma.
The new rule excuses solicitor attendance in most fast track civil cases and Crown court trials, guilty plea cases, sentencing hearings and appeals against conviction.