The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
SOLICITOR advocates have been denied the right to wear wigs in the higher courts after the Lord Chancellor handed down his decision on the matter last week.
Following recent consultation on the subject Lord Mackay sent a letter to Law Society president Charles Elly saying he intended to maintain the status quo that only allows barristers to wear full court dress.
Solicitor advocates will appear in a black stuff gown with bands.
"As with the wider consultation undertaken in August 1992, there was no consensus among those individuals and organisations who responded," says Lord Mackay's letter. "I have therefore concluded that the case for change is not made out."
But Elly, who supports the abolition of wigs for both sides of the profession, says the decision is "indefensible" and says "it will not last long".
"The purpose of particular court dress is to provide a uniform which identifies the role of the wearer, not to continue petty distinctions between solicitors and barristers which are irrelevant to court users," says Elly.
"Two weeks ago a judge had to apologise for a slur on solicitors which implied that they should be seen as second-class citizens.
"The distinction in court dress will serve to perpetuate such out-dated prejudices, when the Lord Chancellor ought to have aimed to eradicate them," says Elly.