The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Slaughter and May racked up fees of £7m advising the government on the British Energy restructuring, it emerged today (17 March) - but the National Audit Office (NAO) has criticised the way the firm was appointed.
In its report on the restructuring, the NAO criticised the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) for not running a competitive tendering process to appoint Slaughters, Credit Suisse First Boston and Deloitte as advisers.
The three firms were already acting for the DTI on other matters when British Energy approached the DTI for help in September 2002.
The report reveals that between September 2002 and the end of the restructuring in January 2005, Slaughters was paid £7m in fees. The firm’s hourly rates were “reviewed and increased” in January 2004.
The firm was appointed after the DTI extended an existing contract, which the firm had won through a competitive tender.
Credit Suisse was paid £11m in fees, while Deloitte pulled in £10m. The DTI paid other legal advisers in Canada, the US and Scotland, including McGrigors, a total of £397,000 in the same period.
The fees pale into insignificance when compared to Clifford Chance’s £25.7m payout for work done for British Energy itself.
Slaughters partner Charles Randell, who acted for the DTI, could not be reached for comment.