The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom has helped seal victory at the High Court for client Alfa-Access-Renova (AAR) in its multibillion-dollar dispute with UK oil giant BP.
The dispute kicked off earlier this year when BP announced a £10bn share swap with Russia’s state-owned oil company Rosneft in January, part of a lucrative deal that would also have involved a long-term agreement to explore oil reserves in the Arctic.
AAR is a consortium of shareholders with a 50 per cent stake in TNK-BP, BP’s existing joint venture in Russia. AAR argued that the Rosneft deal would breach the terms of its shareholder agreement with TNK-BP and secured an injunction against the deal on 1 February.
At an expedited hearing at the High Court on 25 March, the tribunal upheld AAR’s position.
AAR was advised by Skadden partners David Kavanagh and Scott Simpson and associate barrister Adam Baradon, with Skadden instructing Brick Court Chambers’ Mark Howard QC.
BP turned to Linklaters London litigation chief Michael Bennett, who instructed another Brick Court silk, Mark Hapgood QC. Although it was not named in the litigation, Rosneft instructed Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer London partner Sebastian Lawson and Moscow associate Sergei Diyachenko.
Under the terms of the TNK-BP joint venture, BP must first offer any potential opportunities in Russia to TNK-BP. The UK company could now pursue the option of a share swap with Rosneft, but drop the Arctic oil exploration agreement.