The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
City firm Simmons & Simmons is attempting to force France to answer allegations that state subsidies were used to undercut the market price of coal.
The firm, representing private coal company Thion & Cie, claims that state-owned coal company Groupe Charbonnages de France was involved in a potential misuse of an estimated £21m in state funds.
A formal complaint has been submitted by Simmons & Simmons to the European Commission. It has issued a formal Letter of Objection to France regarding possible infringements of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) regulations.
Jacques de Taisne, corporate partner at Simmons & Simmons' Paris office, says: "This decision comes after a number of other law firms have been in front of French courts on similar cases without result.
"When Thion & Cie came to us it was clear that we would have to move towards a European decision."
The possible misuse of state aid is alleged to have happened between 1994 and 1997.
De Taisne says the problems arose after Groupe Charbonnages de France turned from excavation work in the public sector to trading as a commercial entity after the continuing closure of coal mines.
He claims: "It was able to supply coal at very favourable prices while others were stuck with the market rate. We are concerned that it was using state aids to offer these prices."
The European Commission will be entitled to issue a formal decision to France after allowing other ECSC states to give an opinion on the Letter of Objection if France fails to provide evidence to the contrary.