- Employment (55)
- Company/Commercial (47)
- Real Estate (33)
- In-House (19)
- Construction (13)
- Regulatory and compliance (13)
- Intellectual Property (11)
- Media/Entertainment/Sport (10)
- Corporate (9)
- Information Technology (9)
- Banking / Finance (7)
- Insolvency & restructuring (7)
- Crime (6)
- Financial services (6)
- Public Sector/Local Authority (6)
- Family (5)
- Human Rights (5)
- Insurance/reinsurance (5)
- Planning (5)
- Professional Indemnity/Negligence (5)
- Healthcare (4)
- Pensions (4)
- Tax (4)
- Commodities (3)
- Competition/EU (3)
- Environment (3)
- Personal Injury (3)
- Business Tax (2)
- Clinical/Medical Negligence (2)
- Energy (2)
- Privacy and reputation (2)
- Travel and Tourism (2)
- Charities (1)
- Funds (1)
- Immigration (1)
- Licensing/Gaming/Betting (1)
- Pharma/Biotech (1)
- Telecoms (1)
- Transport (Including aviation and shipping) (1)
Sort By: Newest first | Oldest first
Zurich v IEG – be aware of the difference in approach between Guernsey- and UK-based claims.
The Court of Appeal has given guidance on how employment tribunals should approach the question of causation in discrimination cases.
Adidas AG recently filed a claim against Marc Jacobs International LLC in the US Federal Court for allegedly infringing its iconic Three Stripes trademark.
It would still be prudent to include commission in holiday pay calculations until Lock v British Gas appeal is heard later this year.
Employers can face serious legal liability if they fail to manage stress appropriately.
To clarify the key employment policies of each political party, Shoosmiths has summarised each of the parties’ positions below.
Three recent events have encouraged the Health and Safety Sentencing Council in its task…...
Including information on driving checks, fees for intervention and sentencing guidelines for health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences.
The appeal against the High Court’s ruling of JW Spear & Sons Ltd, Mattel Inc and Mattel UK Limited v Zynga Inc was decided recently – what does the decision mean for brand owners?
Landmark judgment clarifies the law on misuse of private information.
This is the last of three articles discussing changes in the law applying to the termination of assured shorthold tenancies (ASTs).
The aim of the act is to stop people being deterred from participating in socially useful activities due to worries about liability (although one peer said its text ‘would barely muster a pass in GCSE legal studies’).
The unilateral actions of one landlord could spark a chain of events that determines the entire lease...
Article includes practical points that may help insurers.
Under the Recast Brussels Regulation it is easier, quicker and cheaper to enforce EU judgments in England and Wales.
The extent to which the tenant of a commercial property requires to maintain and repair the premises will invariably be regulated by the terms of the written lease.
In March significant increases in the cost of issuing proceedings for money claims came into force. It is likely that claims of mid- to high-value will be most affected.
Employers should review contracts, commission schemes and holiday pay processes to ensure they are compliant with the new requirements.
Developments in technology like the new Apple Watch mean social media use in the workplace is only likely to increase. Shoosmiths looks at how employers should deal with it.
On 10 January 2015, new EU rules on jurisdiction and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters came into effect as a result of the Brussels Regulation (recast).