Shoosmiths chief executive Paul Stothard has stepped down from the role after a seven-year reign and is set to leave the firm.
Litigation partner Claire Rowe will succeed him in the position in 1 August after being voted in by the firm’s partnership earlier this week.
Shoosmiths is the only firm not to offer future trainees any payment for pushing back their start dates. When two future joiners, Tom Goff and George Roberts, defended this decision on The Lawyer’s sister title Lawyer2B they were mocked in a series of posts from readers (30 April).
Stothard did not defend the pair in public, although he did stand by the firm’s decision not to offer any compensation to deferring trainees (18 May).
According to Shoosmiths chairman Andrew Tubbs, Stothard’s departure from the firm is amicable.
He said: “He felt the time was right to hand his leadership role to someone new to shape the next chapter in our history. He’s leaving us amicably and we wish him all the very best.”
Rowe, who became a partner in 1990, currently heads the firm’s commercial practice group, which comprises national teams specialising in litigation, commercial and technology, lender services, housing, regulatory, debt recovery, employment and pensions.
She said: “I plan to go ahead with many of Paul’s plans, including ringfencing personal injury as well as launching a rebrand of the consumer business. This is a really exciting time for Shoosmiths and I’m looking forward to taking up my new role.”
Tubbs said: “Claire was elected by partner vote. She has proven leadership ability in her role as head of our successful commercial practice group and as a member of our operations board. She is widely respected by the partners, our staff and her clients alike. I am looking forward to working with her in her new role.”
Readers' comments (23)
Anonymous | 28-May-2009 3:40 pm
Just in relation to an earlier posting about PR advice. You can give the best advice in the world but if management ignores it or thinks they know best and want to do it their way then good luck to you. At that point you wait until the cause of the problem has been removed and then get on with the job of picking up the pieces, no matter how long it takes. A good reputation can take years to build and can be trashed in minutes thanks to poor management decisions, no matter how well they can be rationalised after the event.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Puff | 28-May-2009 4:45 pm
To be clear, the money paid to deferred students is not being paid because firms feel students should have all-expenses-paid holidays or that students are greedy. The payments are to compensate students who had a legitimate expectation and, in many cases, contractual right to take up paid employment, but instead find themselves unemployed and looking for work while they wait another year. Students rely on the TCs they have accepted up to 2 years previously. If an executive signed a contract for a new job and handed in his notice only to find the new job has been unilaterally postponed, he would be able to pursue the company for breach of contract! Also, just because the bigger firms pay fees and some maintenance doesn't mean that a) students don't still incur costs/debts while studying the LPC (and GDL in some cases), or b) all students deferred by their firms even benefitted from the fees/maintenance packages.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 29-May-2009 4:35 pm
The whole charade at Shoosmiths doesn't surpise me in the least in relation to trainees, redundancies etc. I am afraid that Shoosmiths have lost the thing which once set them apart from other firms and that was that once they actually cared about their staff rather than just the extra thousands in the partners pay packets. Its going to take more than just a change in the CEO to turn the rot around.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment