The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
I refer to Mrs Nichols' letter in The Lawyer, 23 September. Her assertion that there are serious practical and management difficulties inherent in the joint appointment of a justices chief executive/justices clerk, is not shared by those I represent and of whom the majority hold joint appointments.
It is our experience, rather than Mrs Nichols' opinion, which leads us to believe that joint appointments smooth the passage of both management and legal processes, rather than hindering them.
It is perhaps interesting to note that in the Health Service the separation of roles of practitioner and manager is being reversed in favour of similiar joint appointments quite simply because the complete separation of roles (as presumably Mrs Nichols advocates) causes inefficiency, wasted resources, discussion and conflict.
As we approach the 21st century, those of us who serve the Magistrates' Courts Service might be advised to approach such issues on a more pragmatic and common-sensical basis rather than seeking to rely on outdated ideological dogma.