The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
The Scottish legal system is on the verge of total chaos today as a court appeal decides whether every decision made by temporary sheriffs in the last 22 years is invalid.
The temporary sheriffs - recently made redundant following an appeal court ruling that they contravene the European Convention on Human Rights, introduced in Scotland in May - are now being challenged on different grounds. It is claimed the use of temporary sheriffs on a permanent, albeit part-time basis, contravenes the Sheriff Courts (Scotland) Act 1971, which allows for the use of temporaries only in times of emergency.
Neil Davidson QC is arguing that since 1977, the legislation has been abused since the courts have been dependent on temporary posts instead of being staffed by independent judges. If the appeal against temporaries - who dealt with 25 per cent of the workload in criminal and civil cases - is upheld, legal experts fear prisoners could be freed, even if they entered guilty pleas and couples could find their divorces invalid. The gravity of the case is such that the Lord Advocate himself appeared before senior Scottish judges to argue the case.