The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
US lawyers prosecuting Simmon & Simmons partner David Sandy have presented his defence attorneys with records of statements where he admits to having made and kept copies of the Iqbal diaries.
Sandy is charged with tampering with evidence relating to the BCCI inquiry. He denies any wrong-doing.
In an interview in April 1984 in Abu Dhabi, he allegedly said he took computer disks containing the diary from the Shareholders' Committee Office (SCO) in Abu Dhabi, copied them, and returned erased disks between late 1991 and early 1992, say the prosecutors.
Sandy allegedly admitted that he returned blanks so that anyone reviewing SCO files after him would think they were complete.
They quote Sandy as saying he took this action "in the interest of his client" - the BCCI majority shareholders in Abu Dhabi.
They also allege that Sandy told investigators that his "clients needed protection".
The statements say Sandy produced several computer disks containing copies he had made of the Iqbal diary from his office.
In an interview on 29 April, Sandy allegedly said he was aware of the BCCI plea agreement in 1991, obliging BCCI's liquidators to pass on evidence and information to US investigating authorities, and to which the majority shareholders agreed in 1992 in Geneva.
In a third interview on 1 May 1994, he allegedly acknowledged the Geneva agreement and said because he possessed a copy of the diary and not the original, he "was not mandated to release it".