Given the doom and gloom surrounding the property market and notable failures such as Fox Hayes and Hammonds Direct, it makes a change to highlight a firm that appears to be doing well.
Residential property boutique Arc Property Solicitors is not only projecting a 33 per cent increase in turnover for the 2009-10 financial year, it is currently trying to put together a syndicate of business angels to invest around £500,000 in the firm in return for up to 25 per cent of the equity.
“It’s the maximum the rules will allow,” says managing partner Richard Chan of the new, more relaxed rules about law firm ownership. “We feel a bit like we’re in Dragons’ Den and believe very strongly we have a good story to tell.”
Chan, formerly a partner at Leeds firm Kelly & Co, set up Arc in 2004. Chan says he believed at the time he had spotted an opportunity “to do things differently” and fancied making a name for himself away from the confines of a more traditional law firm.
“The main difference with Arc is that we proactively seek out new referrers from around the country using email, the internet and the phone,”
he says. “We don’t just rely on sources in our local markets. Firms that go to the wall tend to sit there waiting for the phone to ring.”
The thinly veiled dig at failed firms such as Fox Hayes and Hammonds Direct reflects a bullishness about Chan and his firm that he hopes will attract investors. Arc’s model, he adds, is to build a large number of referrers such as estate agents and brokers from around the country to spread the risk.
“The firms that have gone to the wall had all their eggs in one basket,” Chan claims. “They were relying too heavily on one or two key referrers.”
Chan also claims that his clients prefer dealing with their solicitor via email or on the phone.
“The days are gone when they want to go and see a solicitor,” he argues. “Everything we do we can explain over the phone or on email.”
Managing partner: Richard Chan
Turnover: £1.5m
Number of partners: Three
Number of equity partners: Two
Number of lawyers: Six
Number of fee-earners: 11
Total number of staff: 25
Number of offices: Two
Locations: Harrogate, London
Practice area: Residential property
Readers' comments (5)
Anonymous | 30-Sep-2010 1:22 pm
ARC definately do things differently. Take a look at the numerous reviews on the net which unfortunately suggest their 'pile em high sell it cheap' system does not work. Terrible communication structure and clearly not customer focused at all.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 8-Oct-2010 3:39 pm
I recently have my conveyancing done for the purchasing of my town house in the north-east, they were very prompt and easy to deal with. What more could you want!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 25-Mar-2011 2:26 pm
Great service overall. Very happy to recommend them and having seen lots of positive testimonials it would seem others are too so all good.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Kenza | 3-Oct-2012 10:51 pm
Most awful service ever. Do not use them: calls are NEVER returned and emails are not answered. Their tracking system is a gimmick: it does and never worked. Avoid at all cost. This company should be closed down. They are cheap but whatever little you pay , the customer service is actually below 0. "Chan also claims that his clients prefer dealing with their solicitor via email or on the phone": That may well be the case: it is just very infortunate the their solicitor does not deal with them (the customers) in return either by phone or email - which is a major problem for an organisation which boasts of carrying out the whole conveyancing process via emails and telephone! Awful does not begin to describe this company!!! One word: AVOID. I found out - only too late - that there is a Facebook group of people who have been duped like me. Have a look!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
rj | 26-May-2013 0:43 am
I too have had a nightmare experience with this company. they should stick to selling double glazing or vitamin pills, or whatever they did before this joke of a business. PLEASE AVOID AT ALL COSTS
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment