Revealed: females make up less than 10 per cent of top 100's equity partner ranks
24 October 2012 | By Lucy Burton
Related Articles
UK200 2011
12 October 2011
Top of the PEPs - PEP Table
20 July 2007
UK200 2011 Contents
The UK200 2011
Top of the PEPs - Revenue Table
20 July 2007
Focus: Simmons female representation - Lady billers
25 October 2010
Related Firms
Female partners remain a minority at top UK firms, with just 23.5 per cent of all partners and 9.4 per cent of all equity partners across the UK’s largest 100 law firms by revenue being female.

Among the magic circle, including Slaughter and May, female lawyers constituted 14.6 per cent of total partners and around 13.5 per cent of equity partners in the 2011-12 financial year, figures from this year’s The Lawyer UK 200 have revealed, with Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer having the lowest proportion of female partners at just 12 per cent.
“It’s tempting to say that this is because of a 24/7 culture or an ‘all boys’ network, but I think that’s quite superficial,” said King & Spalding partner Suzanne Rab, a former lawyer for both Freshfields and Slaughter and May. “I think it’s more to do with the fact that the legal profession is very slow to change - it changes slower than society. Change normally only happens if it makes business sense - why would a firm in a relatively good position want to change? It takes real courage to change something that may not be perceived to be broken.”
Outside the magic circle, the firms in the top 20 with the highest proportion of female partners are Berrymans Lace Mawer (38 per cent), Irwin Mitchell (30.9 per cent), Kennedys (38.2 per cent) and Shoosmiths (32.4 per cent). The proportions improve among firms ranked 50-100 by turnover, with Manches (45.6 per cent), Pannone (40.8 per cent), Russell Cooke (40 per cent) and Sackers (50 per cent) either edging towards or hitting a 50/50 gender split.
Despite these figures, the equity remains a male-dominated domain. At Taylor Wessing, for example, while 15.7 per cent of the total partnership is female, just 8 per cent of the equity partnership is. Similarly, 8 per cent of Simmons & Simmons’ equity partners are women while 14.2 per cent of its total partners are.
Caroline Rawes, director of human resources and development at Taylor Wessing, highlighted the recent recruitment of Alix Prentice in the firm’s financial institutions and markets group and Amanda Nelson in the private client team as examples of steps the firm is taking to try to redress this gender imbalance, but accepted that there was more to be done.
“We’re aware that female partner numbers for the firm are low and this is an area to which we’ve been committed to improving for some time,” she told The Lawyer.
The figures suggest it is traditional City firms that are finding it the hardest to retain senior female staff, with anecotal evidence suggesting that the masculine atmosphere at such firms can put some women off.
“I saw that women in senior positions had to adopt male attributes to get ahead,” said one former magic circle lawyer who has since left the City. “I didn’t want to change myself to stay.”
However, Avril Martindale, an IP partner and co-head of Freshfields’ London diversity leadership committee, said firms are taking steps to create an inclusive working enviornment.
“Creating an environment in which everyone can realise their full potential and feel that their work is valued is a business imperative for us,” she said. “Like many organisations, and law firms in particular, we still have plenty more to do. There’s still a disproportionate gap between the number of women we’re recruiting at trainee level and the number who make it into our partnership ranks.”
It is a similar picture at Clifford Chance. A spokesperson for the firm said: “Improving the gender balance of our partnership is an important goal for the firm – we have previously stated our ambition that women should make up at least 30 per cent of our partnership. Our priority is to secure a sustainable improvement while maintaining our strongly meritocratic culture.”

Alison Eddy
However, Alison Eddy, who became the first woman to hold a top regional position at Irwin Mitchell when she was made London managing partner earlier this year, said that setting targets for female representation is not necessarily the best way of dealing with gender imbalances within firms.
“In our view, [having a high number of female partners] is not about setting quotas,” she said. “It has to be about identifying the best people, regardless of gender or background, and giving them the opportunities to progress in our firm. More than half of the associates promoted to partner level in the past two years have been female but they weren’t promoted just because they were female. They were promoted based on their strong performance and contribution to the firm. For us, it’s not about who you are or where you’re from, it’s about what you can achieve and what you can bring to our business.”
Irwin Mitchell has recently been given ABS approval as it looks to implement ambitious growth plans. Eddy said the changes in the legal sector mean that there will be more female lawyers than male by 2015 and that firms need to adapt.
For the full data see this year’s The Lawyer UK 200
Bottom 30 firms in the UK 100 by proportion of female equity partners
| Firm | Turnover 2011-12 (£m) | Total partners | Total female equity partners | Proportion female equity (%) |
| Ward Hadaway | 30.00 | 69 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Optima Legal | 22.85 | 12 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Howard Kennedy | 27.80 | 57 | 1 | 1.8 |
| Foot Anstey | 22.88 | 48 | 1 | 2.1 |
| Gateley | 61.50 | 143 | 3 | 2.1 |
| Speechly Bircham | 57.60 | 91 | 2 | 2.2 |
| Weightmans | 77.10 | 151.1 | 3.6 | 2.4 |
| TLT | 44.50 | 68 | 2 | 2.9 |
| Field Fisher Waterhouse | 97.60 | 146.9 | 4.38 | 3.0 |
| DWF | 102.00 | 152 | 5 | 3.3 |
| Holman Fenwick Willan | 123.90 | 127 | 5 | 3.9 |
| Trowers & Hamlins * | 80.80 | 121 | 5 | 4.1 |
| Fladgate | 25.90 | 48 | 2 | 4.2 |
| Farrer & Co | 49.60 | 71.8 | 3 | 4.2 |
| Freeth Cartwright | 36.73 | 91 | 4 | 4.4 |
| Hill Dickinson | 110.10 | 172 | 8 | 4.7 |
| Bond Pearce | 46.50 | 72.21 | 3.36 | 4.7 |
| Clyde & Co | 287.00 | 230 | 11 | 4.8 |
| Parabis Law | 108.00 | 61 | 3 | 4.9 |
| Simmons & Simmons | 251.70 | 203 | 10 | 4.9 |
| Berwin Leighton Paisner | 246.00 | 209.2 | 10.4 | 5.0 |
| Taylor Wessing | 212.50 | 311 | 15.5 | 5.0 |
| Hugh James | 28.50 | 40 | 2 | 5.0 |
| Winckworth Sherwood | 23.90 | 40 | 2 | 5.0 |
| Pinsent Masons | 220.50 | 256 | 13 | 5.1 |
| Ince & Co | 91.60 | 97 | 5 | 5.2 |
| Herbert Smith | 480.00 | 270 | 14 | 5.2 |
| Bird & Bird ** | 235.00 | 230 | 12 | 5.2 |
| Macfarlanes | 102.20 | 70.6 | 3.7 | 5.2 |
| Russell Jones & Walker | 45.00 | 52 | 3 | 5.8 |
* Trowers & Hamlins have 35 female partners, 29.2% of the total.
** Bird & Bird have 53 female partners, 23% of the total.
View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page


Readers' comments (45)
Harris Berry | 24-Oct-2012 3:52 pm
Why the sob story all the time. If they want to make partners they should work and they ll get made up. There is no magic to it. This is not government job...any private sector job should be on merits and same sacrifices that everyone makes to get there.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Female lawyer | 24-Oct-2012 3:54 pm
I agree with Eddy, setting target is not the best way to change the situation. However, sometimes having a specific target will help firms stay focused and get there faster. But the underlying same old difficulty really goes down to the personal and life style choice made by women when they have a family. If law firms' way of working and business driven nature don't change, the fundamental change won't happen.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Phil | 24-Oct-2012 4:19 pm
Given the average age of equity partners and the rigid (and long) locksteps most firms employ, it is hardly surprising that a high female intake hasn't filtered through yet. It simply reflects recruitment figures from the 70s.
Rather than providing one-off 'shock value' figures it may be more helpful to gve a breakdown of how female/male ratios change with PQE and whether there is an upward trend in female partner appointments (which may let us forecast future equity figures).
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anon | 24-Oct-2012 4:36 pm
So what?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 24-Oct-2012 5:31 pm
Can anyone from Weightmans, Filed Fisher Waterhouse, Bond Pearce, BLP, Taylor Wessing and Mcfarlanes let us know how you have less than a whole number of female equity partners, I hope this is not dwarfism discrimination in practice.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Catherine | 24-Oct-2012 6:02 pm
It's amazing to see even from the comments that men just dont get it - dear Harris, unfortunately it is not the same - if a man and a woman decide to have a child - this does not reflect in a negative way on the father's career at a law firm, but a woman has to take time off, is not able to work at her best for 9 months before the birth (due to generally feeling extremely tired and sick) and for some time when she is back, especially if she is back only after a few months. This multiplies if you have two children - again no impact on the father's career but the woman out of say 4 years at a law firm, would have only worked less than a year when she was not either pregnant or on the maternity leave, so when the law firm thinks considers those two for a partnership - guess whom they are going to chose?
And Phil - 70s was 40 years ago - average lawyer is considered for a partnership after around 7-8 years - there was plenty of time to change the ratios...
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Reflection of reality, (and not a bad thing) | 24-Oct-2012 8:47 pm
The real question is: why do we somewhat naively think that women would, or should, be 50% of all equity partners in what is a remorseless profession that destroys home life, turns relationships sour, makes parents total strangers to their children and warps even initially balanced people into workaholic maniacs?
Thank God that at least part of the population has more sense that to want to become an equity partner at a City law firm.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 25-Oct-2012 1:13 am
Male Chauvinists
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Dave Cote | 25-Oct-2012 3:30 am
If women has a strong interest in equity partnerships, they will get them in the existing firms or go out and risk starting up new, female oriented ones. That shall either make the existing top firms change to keep the best with them, or the new firms will be challenging for top ranking with the best among their ranks. In either case the current top firms will adapt to continue to hold their valued position, not to demean women, or keep control in the hands of men or anything of the sort.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Nicky Richmond | 25-Oct-2012 9:23 am
Brecher statistics :
15 partners -7 women
4 EP's -2 women.
It would be interesting to see the statisitics for those (few) firms where the managing partner is female.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment